Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
archi42
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
89 ms
·
901.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I'm currently in a similar spot, but am very surprised you did not mention MicroG, which is an open reimplementation of the Google APIs. There seem to be some issues with GCM (or, more precisely, the newer replacement - uhm, FCM?), but
902.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
TI has a nice product search. E.g.: http://www.ti.com/audio-ic/amplifiers/speaker-amplifiers/pro...
903.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
Just to be clear: The first half should be obvious to the asker, and you're totally right about it. But the real reason I upvoted you is the "All of that said:" paragraph. That's the real lesson to be learned here.
904.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
For a beginner, I'd get a decent, pre-built guitar amp that "just works" with decent sound and only basic controls (as opposed to a digital amp with millions of mediocre effects). You can always add some DIY effect pedals, or
905.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
Don't they make these ICs with I2S? Then all you need is something that digitally interfaces with your source (eg toslink, usb) and "unpacks" the PCM data and sends it out via i2s. Edit: look for example at TI TAS5756M, TAS32
906.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
Oh, that one looks neat. I've got another Ali module with integrated Bluetooth for use in my study room. Theoretically the parts have decent specs, but the module has a high noise level and the speaker makes a loud popping sound with a
907.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
Hm... A non-optimizing compiler? Nice hobby, but I don't see the point of this. Even folks doing safety critical stuff (like in failure = dead people) use -O0 and are craving for some optimizations. E.g. why no DCE? Constant propagatio
908.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
That really depends on your load. I once feared a huge performance regression when a test took 2 minutes instead of 40s. Turned out one instance ran on a i7-6xxx machine, and the other on a i7-9x0. Normalizing for the different clock, the n
909.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
While this point of view is a neat idea and part of me really likes it, I'm afraid those people just want to make as much cash as possible. Also, if they make 750M$, that's 750M$ they deprived other parts of society of (e.g. app d
910.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
A. reminds me of JS objects. B. is to expected, and I think it might be useful; e.g. we prevent accidental copying of singletons in C++ via operator= (T &other) = delete; . I'd guess you could do something similar in python. To
911.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I wasn't too sure on some of the easy questions, but this swap... Oh god, my "someday, this is going to shoot someone in the foot"-sense started to tingle.
912.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
Not to be splitting hairs, but isn't the mechanical Z1 more like a first gen computer, making this second gen? (This doesn't make CSIRAC a less impressive feat ;)
913.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
If it was my kid, I'd use any single board computer or an old laptop (pro: integrated keyboard and screen, e.g. Dell D630), and install a Linux that boots straight into QB64: https://www.qb64.org/ I didn't test if
914.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I expected them to have stolen physical stuff, like a GSM sniffer or stuff like that. This is more like Wannabee Gangstas Gained Illicit Access to Database that Tracks Almost Every American .
915.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I usually shudder at duck typing and/or GC for anything bigger. Both have the ugly tendency to explode in your face at runtime. The first type of error doesn't occur in C++ (at runtime), and in the other instance I feel like havin
916.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
This. If you're going to malloc/free equally sized objects often but randomly, a pool allocator can be a great improvement. With real time requirements you often care about your response time or worst case execution time. In some
917.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I know where you're coming from, I did the same just two gens earlier (i7-2600, r9 290, WQHD) and am quite happy with that. But: That's back then... Today the situation is different, since the two can actually compete.
918.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I doubt that number, too. Our CPU-bound workload runs "only" 20% faster on an i7-6xxx than it did on an i7-920 (calculated for equal clocks; due to the higher clock it was actually about 60% faster, which caused me to do the math
919.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I'm sure I'm drying my stuff in a dryer. If necessary even in summer (though trying to avoid it when it's warm enough). Also, my employer has AC in all offices ;) Public smoking depends on the region; where I live it's p
920.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
That's probably true. I admit the first time I got in contact with ThinkPads was around 2006; so whatever was affordable for students back then might have stuck (tbh, I never had a TP until a year ago; and the Helix something entirely
921.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I think ThinkPads are renown for the earlier products (eg T410 or the x200 series). Much like the Dell D630 used to be a Linux favourite. The BIOS sleep state issue seems common with modern Lenovos though (my 2nd Gen Helix is also a mess),
922.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
They've been doing that quite a while now. Funnily, they still let me use my workplace, (sometimes) but never my home address. Just more incentive to move away from Google (which is sad, because the services are great; I'd even pa
923.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I imagine if you have a list of welding points and feed that list to both the assembly and inspection robots, stuff like this happens. Especially in case the robots share code and e.g. have the same parse error when loading your list of wel
924.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
Oh, this +1. I ported it to another C dialect (test case for the compiler) and found those parts I touched well structured and easy to understand.
925.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
What's the purpose of this? Seems like "I want to build that" to me. So wings would defeat the primary purpose - but once the initial goal is reached, I personally would give it a shot (for the pure fun of doing it and see if
926.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I bet it's a nice feeling to get this kind of "your work is cool". But this would probably violate copyrights law (unless he uses e.g. a attribution-less CC variant). And Apple is but above that. I would also want to make sur
927.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
But no trust vectoring :( still looks neat.
928.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
Nice! I wonder if it would be possible to add wings and build a VTOL plane with thrust-vectoring?
929.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I'm not aware this is possible. The git commits form some kind of depended hash tree, so you can not "rewrite history" without screwing up that tree. Meaning: If someone altered the code on GitHub, the current trunks hash wou
930.
▲
by
archi42
8y ago
I wonder why the author doesn't call this construct by its name: Lambda functions? I'm not using Java anymore, but this write up seemed nice: https://blog.codecentric.de/2013/10/java-8-erste-schritte-mi..
More ›