arccy

30 ms·

1. 751.▲
   by arccy 2y ago

   you should be able to refine question titles
2. 752.▲
   by arccy 2y ago

   I don't see why you couldn't use it for non SaaS, the Fair Source License (FSL) [1] they're using here doesn't say anything about hosting, only competition in the form of: > - substitutes for the Software; > - subs
3. 753.▲
   by arccy 2y ago

   sometimes that's the only way to get the message across to leaders
4. 754.▲
   by arccy 2y ago

   how will it make flying for the rich less inconvenient
5. 755.▲
   by arccy 2y ago

   See protobuf field presence: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/docs/f...
6. 756.▲
   by arccy 2y ago

   Would you trust a post that can't even get the abbreviation correct? k8s has a meaning: in k-ubernete-s there are 8 letters between the k and the s.
7. 757.▲
   by arccy 2y ago

   by the same argument the systemd binary logs also follow the unix philosophy
8. 758.▲
   by arccy 2y ago

   they have the ability to do essentially git gc and drop unreachable commits
9. 759.▲
   by arccy 2y ago

   for the times when you actually want to put something on the card, like plane tickets and hotels
10. 760.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    still have to be careful about going over credit utilization...
11. 761.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    depends if you define long tail as customer count vs contract size
12. 762.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    What about oxide's stuff?
13. 763.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    there's an eBPF mode for linux which is safe(r) so windows can still be blamed for not providing a relatively safe way of doing this.
14. 764.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    Land of the Fee
15. 765.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    > Apple has done a much better job with macOS in terms of security and performance. Do not underestimate corporate IT's ability to slow down Macs with endpoint security software.
16. 766.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    you may be able to get overhead bin space (near your seat)
17. 767.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    or they wouldn't know if your answers could even be trusted, they need to be able to validate your answers.
18. 768.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    you deal with countries and a few big publishers, not a few thousand cities each who want to be special
19. 769.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    and how do you manage them? you use the same tooling that exists for all public images by running a container registry.
20. 770.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    > even as we have a common industry definition which is grounded on scientific methods there's hardly anything scientific about devops, it's all about culture and people
21. 771.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    The tooling for managing the "lower" layers is progressively worse / slower / harder the closer to the metal you get, so you usually are paying a heavy premium for convenience / DX. Only very specific serverless pro
22. 772.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    the simple workaround would be to have .envrc optionally load another gitignored file if it exists, which sounds much safer than accidentally committing local changes, even with plain git.
23. 773.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    patch sounds too specific... like an actual patch file tied to the actual contents of the patch. change is probably the right word, you want to change something, the exact operations of the change (multiple revisions of different patches) c
24. 774.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    can't you just add them to gitignore? if you want it to be local only, there's also .git/info/exclude or for all your repos with ~/.config/git/ignore
25. 775.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    you'll usually find binaries in github releases (see the assets section: https://github.com/mr-karan/doggo/releases )
26. 776.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    I guess not using one of the proxies? for some reason their v1.0.0 commit isn't attached to anything... https://github.com/mr-karan/doggo/commit/fe3958594df46c000ef...
27. 777.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    based on my experience with gitlab... anything is better than it at scale
28. 778.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    those terms have already been used in various distro installers for installations that contain very little, but still all the setup for you to expand it into a full blown distro with the package manager. The distroless images specifically d
29. 779.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    so pretty stable, and you're mad that other people won't do free work for you to implement a mostly unused spec.
30. 780.▲
    by arccy 2y ago

    One of Go's goals is no arbitrary code execution during during compiles, so it will ~never pull in any code generation tools and run them for you.