Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
arccy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
571.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
stuff like https://lunrjs.com/ works
572.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
in the us that's the precheck line...
573.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
is it ever just $15?
574.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
google knows, it's just the advertisers that use their services don't care enough to filter audience by language (or think it's not worth it, sometimes images are enough to entice customers...).
575.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
prometheus isn't a company though? maybe you're on some other vendor that runs it for you?
576.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
we invent new functions to use to decorate our CVs with
577.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
they might be subsidized less than the rural areas, but they're still subsidized by the urban core.
578.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
if google were to transfer the keys elsewhere, they would have (temporary) custody of the keys, granting them access, and invalidating the statement.
579.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
have separate salt / pepper / user id args
580.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
way to FUD, leaking data out of the apps I choose is still a privacy violation.
581.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
tariffs, sale restrictions, trade wars
582.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
the lack of proper tabs / multi instance support for many desktop apps makes me hate them. the possible quality range of a desktop app is much bigger than that of a web app, and given normal distribution of developer skill levels, i&#x
583.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
if you use a real stablecoin like USDC where they don't promise magic yield rates, then you'd be safe. otherwise you're just lending money to some questionable people.
584.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
the plane separation is important though, you want to ensure your control messages always go through, like how servers have a dedicated line for management.
585.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
this comment is ai written garbage
586.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
git bisect run can take a script, you can easily script adding a test case and running the test, either to an existing file or a new file.
587.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
I think C# is just too associated to .Net like how Ruby is tied to Rails. Plus it's a Microsoft managed language, and if you're looking to move out of JS / TS, then you probably don't trust Microsoft's management of
588.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
(opportunity) cost to dig into ownership
589.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
i think it's more an argument to not use the dumpster fire that is golangci-lint
590.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
it probably doesn't, and good vulnerability scanners like govulncheck from the go team won't complain about them, because they're unreachable from your source code. now, do you care about some development tool you're run
591.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
well now it leans in to go's reproducible tooling so it's declaratively configured and shared between your team and your CI/CD environment too.
592.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
yes let's have a meta project that can track the version of my tools "separately", and the version of my repo. linters, formatters, reproducible codegen should be tracked. their output is deterministic and you want to enforce
593.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
thankfully major versions in go have different names (module, module/v2, module/v3) enforced by tooling, so you'll never upgrade to the next major (except v0 -> v1).
594.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
the versions in go.mod are an enforcement of the versions required by your dependencies, and those your module require. asking for it to be reproducible from scratch is like deleting package.json in a node project and asking it to magic all
595.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
you don't have to use this feature if you don't like it...
596.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
control the go version with the `toolchain` directive, replace protoc with buf.build (which is way better anyway).
597.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
better motivation for rewrite it in go... but are there really that many tools you need in a go project not written in go?
598.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
There's module graph pruning https://go.dev/ref/mod#graph-pruning
599.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
would it really change that quickly? you might get significant savings from just having keywords, common variable names, standard library functions
600.
▲
by
arccy
2y ago
probably because bzip2 isn't a very good format
More ›