arandomusername

13 ms·

31.
by arandomusername 1y ago
> First, Hamas are openly genocidal terrorists Israel is the one actually committing a genocide though. > the claim that Mossad funded ISIS is antisemitic propaganda, on the face of it. Is that why ISIS apologised after accidentally a
32.
by arandomusername 1y ago
And how is America benefiting from "projecting power" throughout the middle east?
33.
by arandomusername 1y ago
> "Imperialismo Americano". And how did America benefit? They didnt. But you know who did? Israel.
34.
by arandomusername 1y ago
Israel can't execute regime change by themselves, so US will definitely get involved.
35.
by arandomusername 1y ago
Israel has been oppressing Palestinians long before Oct 7th. Israel was involved in supporting ISIS. That's why ISIS never attacked Israel (except that one time accidentally which they apologized for! How crazy is that?) https:/&
36.
by arandomusername 1y ago
Netanyahu has consistently said he wanted a regime change in Iran, alongside Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan. Iran does not want to end up like the other countries.
37.
by arandomusername 1y ago
> Iran wants to have nuclear weapons to destroy Israel That's often spread by Jewish media, but I see no evidance for this. Iran's supreme leader has issued a fatwa against nuclear weapons. > Israel has nothing against Iran
38.
by arandomusername 1y ago
True, Trump's words are worthless. I'm hearing that the Iranian state media is claiming no irreversible damage at Fordow / only entry points were targeted - but ofcourse that doesn't carry much weight either.
39.
by arandomusername 1y ago
Iran is prone to earthquakes, would an earthquake bomb do more damage than that? Even if it just damages the centrifuges, as far as I see it, it would just delay their enrichment process, severely less than total destruction of their underg
40.
by arandomusername 1y ago
Iran will definitely continue pursuing uranium enrichment. IRIB claims that the enriched uranium stockpile was moved away from those locations - which makes sense, so they probably didn't lose their stockpile. They will build new enric
41.
by arandomusername 1y ago
Because Israel is the only nation in that region that has nuclear weapons, and the main reason why Iran wants to have nuclear weapons.
42.
by arandomusername 1y ago
Replace Israel with Iran and your question remains the same. Iran doesn't want to end up like Iraq, Afghanistan, or Libya.
43.
by arandomusername 1y ago
The GBU-57 was most likely used, which is non nuclear
44.
by arandomusername 1y ago
Should US start bombing North Korea too? And Russia too? Can't let them have nukes either. The initial nuclear agreement that Trump tore up was a good starting point
45.
by arandomusername 1y ago
What does "unauthorized" mean here? Who needs to authorize weapons-grade uranium enrichment? The GBU-57 is dope. Really curious to see how well it worked here
46.
by arandomusername 1y ago
True - agreed. Now we need to get rid of Israel's nuclear weapons.
47.
by arandomusername 1y ago
> I wonder if the bunker buster was used Most certainly was. It's underground (Fordow is ~60m?) so it's either that or nukes.
48.
by arandomusername 1y ago
It doesn't. It's all because Israel has extreme influence over US politicians.
49.
by arandomusername 1y ago
> Israel is the wedge and leverage to eliminating governments of Iran, Pakistan, China and then India and weakening Russia further. China and India? and Russia? Israel doesn't care about them. Israel is using America and Europe to g
50.
by arandomusername 1y ago
Then don't use it? It's completely optional and works perfectly fine without AI
51.
by arandomusername 1y ago
the only reason Iran wants nuclear weapons is because Israel has them.
52.
by arandomusername 1y ago
It's very common, ever since twitter added monetization. It makes the site a lot more unbearable.
53.
by arandomusername 1y ago
That's a fair point. USSR soldiers did mass rape women in conquered territories (and even their own). And the Brits did have that famine in India that killed a lot as well. Maybe the Nazis were worse, but wasn't really a good vs e
54.
by arandomusername 1y ago
[flagged]
55.
by arandomusername 1y ago
By siding with the USSR, and letting them take control over eastern Europe? The USSR was just as bad as Nazi Germany.
56.
by arandomusername 1y ago
That's not racism. That's being factual. Nations are bound together by common traits, including ethnicity. Italian, is an ethnicity. Chinese, is an ethnicity. Racism is denying the European indigineous people the right to their ow
57.
by arandomusername 1y ago
Have you been to any of those cities in the last 5-10 years? Paris and London used to be great cities. Not anymore, they are just living off their formal glory. It feels like your image of London/Paris is based of movies and tv shows.
58.
by arandomusername 1y ago
I will yield that culture is nurture, but others are not. If my twin was adopted and raised in China, they will not be Chinese. They will still be European. > Oh, like Paris? Yeah, a complete shadow of it's former self. It is comple
59.
by arandomusername 1y ago
just an additional note, the instant transfer is only up to 15k euro
60.
by arandomusername 1y ago
> We have a wildly inexpensive and rich resource in the form of our fellow humans Advocating for immigration just so you have cheap labour sounds cruel. > Mixing of cultures and ethnicities is good No it's not. > It makes us s

More ›