aragilar

19 ms·

361.
by aragilar 2y ago
Assuming that other plugins depend on ACF (which I get the impression is a thing?), automattic can probably argue that the use throughout the code is for compatibility reasons. There's also probably interactions with the GPL licenses (
362.
by aragilar 2y ago
The two baseline criteria I have for better-than-LaTeX options are: 1. Maths support equal to or better than amsmath 2. LaTeX-style macros Both are needed to make writing large amounts of complex equations acceptable. There should also be s
363.
by aragilar 2y ago
Note that there can be trailer fields (the phrase "trailing header" is both an oxymoron and a good description of it): https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Tr...
364.
by aragilar 2y ago
Why would you assume there's a disconnect?
365.
by aragilar 2y ago
I believe so, but it would presumably depend on what features you use.
366.
by aragilar 2y ago
There's also Cython. I would guess also that HPy would replace the includes of `Python.h` that pybind11 et al make in order to bind to CPython, and so existing extensions should be easier to port?
367.
by aragilar 2y ago
For work we're looking at proxmox ( https://www.proxmox.com/en/ ).
368.
Mozilla: A free and open internet shouldn't come at the expense of privacy(blog.mozilla.org)
9 points by aragilar 2y ago|3 comments
369.
by aragilar 2y ago
My personal rant is terminals where you cannot configure the default `TERM`.
370.
by aragilar 2y ago
That's assuming a certain type of program is the one you're writing (naturally everyone wants a browser that is bug free and un-exploitable). Not every program talks to the network, not every program handles untrusted data, and no
371.
Kernel Recipes 2024 – CVEs are alive, but no not panic [video](youtube.com)
2 points by aragilar 2y ago|0 comments
372.
by aragilar 2y ago
If stuff was removed, then I would have expected them to bump the ABI? As they haven't done that, I would actually assume it would work absent evidence to the contrary?
373.
by aragilar 2y ago
What is the difference between this and and the approach taken by eggs/buildout (other than the time difference, and so some changes in APIs)? My impression (having never used buildout) was handling multiple versions made debugging har
374.
by aragilar 2y ago
Oh, I get the flow. Only what I'd seen previously is the cups-browsed PPDs only last as long as the source is around (which again, is what I'd seen previously, but I haven't verified the code to see when the cleanup happens,
375.
by aragilar 2y ago
Uh, how? Unless somehow it stays around even though you've left the network (which I didn't think happens, but I could be wrong), this lasts just as long as the mDNS attacking server is on the network? This to me feels like the au
376.
by aragilar 2y ago
No money flows from mozorg to mozcorp (the non profit can't give money to the for profit), and mozcorp develops Firefox. Mozorg is supposed to do advocacy, but it seems MYOB is better at it than Mozilla, and more effective too.
377.
by aragilar 2y ago
Link should probably be replaced by https://noyb.eu/en/firefox-tracks-you-privacy-preserving-fea... , which is NOYB's post on it that everyone referred to.
378.
Mozilla hit with privacy complaint in EU over Firefox tracking tech(techcrunch.com)
7 points by aragilar 2y ago|1 comments
379.
FSL: A Better Business/Open Source Balance Than AGPL(lucumr.pocoo.org)
2 points by aragilar 2y ago|0 comments
380.
by aragilar 2y ago
Why though? Rather than using your own bespoke graphics system (requiring the user to separately configure it) and your own custom DNS server (as opposed to the system one), you could just use the OS. That is all part of the definition of
381.
by aragilar 2y ago
Autoconf is easy, it's the highly bespoke build systems that someone thought would be a good idea that require the right phase of the moon that are the challenge.
382.
by aragilar 2y ago
Wheels do predate conda (though manylinux did base itself on the experience of Anaconda and Enthought's base set of libraries), and there were distributions like Enthought (or even more field specific distributions like Ureka and indiv
383.
by aragilar 2y ago
The OS always was part of the software definition, and always will be (unless you run without an OS/write your own).
384.
by aragilar 2y ago
I believe tensorflow does remove old pre-releases (I know other projects do), so that number I think might be fairly static? That tensorflow is that big isn't surprising, given the install of it plus its dependencies is many gigabytes
385.
by aragilar 2y ago
Also, this is very much assuming that the code is both C or C++ and that LLVM is the right compiler to use. Fortran is still a major part of the ecosystem, which the Zig compiler isn't going to solve. There already exists numerous opti
386.
Deinventing the Wheel [video](youtube.com)
1 points by aragilar 2y ago|0 comments
387.
by aragilar 2y ago
I never really got mosh working nicely with the VPNs and ssh jumphosts I needed to use. I would say vim is excellent over high latency connections, as you can slow down your typing and plan movements and queue up commands. Readline's a
388.
by aragilar 2y ago
Uh, I live in Australia, it's always a problem ;) More seriously, unless you're doing stuff locally (in which case, go ham doing cool things on your system), the tools you use need to work for others, with their requirements and r
389.
by aragilar 2y ago
Over what timeframe do you expect this to happen? It'll take at least 10 years for a new default on all systems (which is a challenge in of itself) to propagate to the point where you could rely on it. There's also the question of
390.
by aragilar 2y ago
But how many of these new tools are robust when there's high latency? The advantage of good old POSIX shell is it works on cheap routers, the latest HPC systems, the system next to me and the system of the literal other side of the wor

More ›