Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aprilthird2021
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
91.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
2mo ago
They understand the very small amount which is used in their far shorter rituals. The original Bible isn't in Latin nor are Catholic masses in Latin anymore
92.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
2mo ago
> By comparison, financial advice is pretty simple, and there is a universally agreed-upon approach that most people should follow to maximize long-term financial health. What will AI do when those rules, which it's trained on their
93.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
> The aspect of '90% of people dont't know what is being said anyways' applies to majority of people around the world accross religions. It does not. The majority of the world is Muslim or Christian and this does not apply
94.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
Please read my comment again. I mentioned that physical presence is necessary but the idea expressed in the comment before mine that people who hire such priests know them well, or that it's the discernment of Hindus rather than a stri
95.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
He should not be fired while trials are going on to determine if his conduct was criminal, against policies or not. That would open them up to wrongful termination if he prevails in court. Why would they settle if they never directed employ
96.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
> If Ben and Jerry's didn't disseminate your memo on how to steal trade secrets from your former employer to its new hires, I'd think you'd have a better point. Did OpenAI do this? And is there proof of it?
97.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
They are currently in a suit with Apple over this. If they fire him and Apple loses the suit and a jury decides he didn't even steal documents (a possible outcome) then he can sue for wrongful termination.
98.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
> the evidence is damning–and comprehensive–against their interests No it is not. An employee stole info from his former employer. There is no proof OpenAI asked for this or used it in any way. Employees could plausibly do such things th
99.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
Businesses don't just price gouge. They often expand their product lines or have R&D to come up with new products and that's more costly than just making the same shoe with the same materials for 40 years. Many consumers feel
100.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
He is not OpenAI. I can steal trade secrets from my employer and get a job as a Ben and Jerry's Ice cream scooper, it doesn't mean Ben and Jerry's has stolen those secrets
101.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
Why would they fire him and settle with Apple? If they haven't done anything wrong, why settle? If he hasn't used the material at work but has some problem with his former employer, why fire him?
102.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
"come on" isn't any kind of proof
103.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
Because it's part of an investigation. Again this isn't proof of anything. He may have not ever used this information at work yet and so this is an issue between him and his former employer
104.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
Come on be so for real right now? I have been to many Hindu events, and the pandit is really just there to make things official and say the words. 90% of attendees don't know what he's actually saying. 80% have never met him or hi
105.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
And yet in this case a human prompted the LLM for this result, not another LLM
106.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
> I'm starting to feel like there's no place left for programmers like me who focus on quickly churning out MVPs. Of course there is. The same way this was only possible as a result from the professor who prompted it with his s
107.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
It is ambiguous still at this stage though. There's no proof he used this info at his job or that he was directed to take it by anyone (he may have thought it helpful to his career in a way OpenAI never asked for or even invited).
108.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
You're kinda right but it's exactly the ease of generation and the lack of time and money spent which makes people value AI output less. A fake Gauguin painting and a real one can be almost indistinguishable to the human eye. But
109.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
It's AI slop
110.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
That's not enough though. He could have been acting rogue or for some other reason. That alone won't win in court
111.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
Your comment assumes they have stolen some propietary info or trade secrets but it hasn't been determined yet that they have, no?
112.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
None of the comments seem to mention that companies get to just cheat you out of your money and get bailed out when caught by Trump: > That toxic cycle is now being sped up by a Trump administration that is defanging government watchdogs
113.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
> So this isn’t an anti-LLM article. It kind of feels like it though. We can be anti-LLM even though it's smart or helpful or whatever. It's reduced so many interesting conversations to this type of boring redirect to just &qu
114.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
I do wonder if a studio that made a lot of smaller games with less technical specs but spent all the money in fun gameplay design and character design and stories would outcompete major AAA game studios. I think I'm just describing mob
115.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
> Can't let their underage harem girls dress normally If you use a strict definition of normal, like practiced by a larger proportion of the world, then they are actually normal and we are WEIRD. If you add history into the mix then
116.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
Why is it a strange claim? > We used to rely on our traditional methods. We sent 200 fighters because we had a lot of strength, but then 60 got killed. They used to try to overpower people. We have 600 and that guard post has 400. We sho
117.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
If you could read you'd know what I wrote there was nothing like what you're claiming
118.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
3mo ago
The pardoned Jan. 6 rioters had a lot of far worse plans that were foiled which could have resulted in more casualties. There was lots of evidence several of them planned to kidnap sitting congressmen and women. Do you know why they were pa
119.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
4mo ago
The dirt bag media! Making insinuation that I actually projected onto their article!
120.
▲
by
aprilthird2021
4mo ago
How can it be inside information if it's in a yahoo article? And why does OP alleging they are talking about technology A not B and you finding out they use technology A (while we all know they also use technology B as well) make OP mo
More ›