Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
apparent
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
751.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
> Merriam-Webster and Oxford both have a definition for majority meaning most, and that's the more common definition that is used in everyday speech. I don't have a subscription to Oxford's dictionary, but MW's lead d
752.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
> Majority doesn't mean more than 50% of the vote in everyday language I guess it depends on whom you hang out with and talk to. I completely agree that some people can't understand the difference and speak accordingly. But I d
753.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
> That's the problem, though. It shows how gullible and easy manipulated the US population was. Trans people are already such a tiny part of society, and an even tinier part of the prison population. But Kamala's position was n
754.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
Tell yourself that if you want, but it's well-documented that the "Kamala's for they/them, Donald Trump is for you" ad was the top performer in the 2024 election cycle. Kamala declined to walk back her support for,
755.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
I agree that some people use the phrase loosely. I would ask such people what they would say to distinguish between someone who actually won the majority of the popular vote versus someone who did not. It's not a "super-majority&q
756.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
I agree that most people who vote for other candidates come from uncompetitive states. But this doesn't necessarily prove your point. If there were more other-candidate supporters who would have voted for Kamala (if they had to vote fo
757.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
That's a pretty longwinded ad hominem you've got right there. Forgive me for not digging into your links again...fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. You're entitled to your opinion, but when you go around
758.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
> Well, hope and faith are not effective strategies. Good luck to those who operate from this perspective, they will face disappointment, which is theirs to own. Hm, worked great for many people I know. I can imagine it would depend on a
759.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
> Try to do better Pretty sure this line never convinced anyone of anything. We all want to do "better" but have different definitions of what that constitutes. > If you don’t think your kids are going to have sex when they’
760.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
> You do realize the current government won the elections and the president won the popular vote right Technically he won a plurality of the popular vote, but he didn't win the popular vote. This is typically not a distinction that
761.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
I wouldn't care so much about WR for a round Pebble, which I'd wear on nicer occasions. I would care more about WR for a watch that I'd wear at the beach or pool, as a way of getting notifications when not carrying my phone.
762.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
Huh interesting, I guess that would help somewhat. But for me, I prefer to pretty much never have to worry about charging my watch. As a kid, I had watches that didn't need new batteries for years. As an adult, I was willing to trade o
763.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
I'll elaborate: if you are worried about being unfaithful, or your spouse being unfaithful, then protecting yourself against one STD might seem like a good idea. And if the risk of unfaithfulness is very high, then it is better to miti
764.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
> Apple Watch SE is $250, and all the re-pebbles are $200 price range? Color me impressed! I have wondered why Eric didn't price them higher, and I think it comes down to wanting to make sure there is sufficient demand to justify pr
765.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
Fair, but that means you have to bring a special purpose charger with you anytime you go somewhere for more than ~36 hours. For me, that's the bigger issue. If I could charge inductively on the back of my iPhone, for example, I wouldn&
766.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
I hear you, but the first new Pebble is getting good reviews. It's been out for months and I've not heard anything bad about it. While the upcoming models are a bit less derivative of past watches, they are still pretty well-groun
767.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
I don't have any fancy watches in reach, but was just talking about watches in general. I think it makes sense to compare $200 Pebbles to similarly-priced watches (smart and otherwise) in this regard. I can imagine that diamond-encrust
768.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
Seems unlikely that there's a way for fathers to accidentally give HPV to their daughters and we haven't figured it out yet. I would think that kissing a baby on the lips would be the best chance, and if that were the case it'
769.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
I get that, but if the question is about e-waste volume, don't we have to compare the amount of e-waste that results from tossing a non-rechargeable ring after it's depleted versus making all of the rings larger and creating charg
770.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
> I decided years ago I’d do this because I was going to have girls and I wanted to minimize my daughters’ risk of cancer. I don't understand: how would your daughters be more/less likely to get cancer based on whether you were
771.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
Yeah, one downside to giving this vaccine to your kids is you're basically telling them you expect they won't do this, even if they plan to (and you planned to, and in fact did). But pediatricians talk about how you really have to
772.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
The bigger issue is that someone who is 40 has likely already been exposed. I know women who had to ask to get it in their late 20's, and only succeeded after convincing the doctor they had been celibate up to that point. Apparently su
773.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
There are other STDs that you'd still be at risk of getting/giving in the case of infidelity, so getting this one vaccine doesn't actually make things all good. I imagine for some people, the thought of possibly bringing home
774.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
I'm curious how you feel about AirPods, for example. They also do not have replaceable batteries, and after a few years of regular use they become increasingly unusable for their intended purpose. I have a different memory than you reg
775.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
How did you decide which colors/sizes to offer this time around? Seems like a reasonable mix, but I also wondered if regular gold could have broader appeal. Perhaps it wouldn't help though, since you'd have to make different
776.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
Yes, the slimness and ability to dress up are certainly huge selling points. It does look about 1/4 thinner than the PT2, which is presumably much thinner/smaller than your fennix. Honestly, even with a PT2 on order, I would consi
777.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
I think pretty much all watches have some sort of raised dial/edge in order to protect the glass. This one is not as small as some, but compared to the original round pebble, this is much, much smaller.
778.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
I thought about it but didn't because the battery life difference is pretty big (10-14 vs 30), and according to his comment below, apparently the battery is not replaceable. I assume it would actually be replaceable if one were suffici
779.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
Who taught you? I didn't know until my 20s and have met many adults who didn't know.
780.
▲
by
apparent
10mo ago
Funny, my PHEV had it on the opposite side. Did you find it difficult to charge at stations, which are often designed for front-left or rear-right charge ports?
More ›