Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
apichat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
31.
▲
by
apichat
6y ago
YES ! first it automatically trust the devices but if you want you can improve it with manual verification : https://gultsch.de/trust.html " TLDR: Automatically trust all new devices of contacts that haven’t been verif
32.
▲
by
apichat
6y ago
> "Signal brings encryption and privacy to meet people where they’re at, not the other way around. People don’t have to choose a server, it can automatically recognize contacts that use Signal, it has emojis, attachments, secure voi
33.
▲
by
apichat
6y ago
Gnu Guix would be a great one ! (the package manager, not the distro GNU Guix System) https://guix.gnu.org/ https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2019/gnu-guix-1.0.0-released/ https://
34.
▲
by
apichat
7y ago
it look like Daff (align and compare tables) https://github.com/paulfitz/daff and Coopy (distributed spreadsheets with intelligent merges) https://github.com/paulfitz/coopy
35.
▲
by
apichat
7y ago
From wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_Bladeless >> In late 2016 and after validating the technology on computational simulations and tech demonstrators, the company reached the prototype stage with
36.
▲
by
apichat
8y ago
It's ok now. They published a new version of Pijul and it seems that it cause some problems. https://pijul.org/posts/2018-11-20-pijul-0.11/ https://pijul.org/posts/2018-04-21-pijul-0.10&#
37.
▲
by
apichat
8y ago
I think that you can find good explanations of these problems here : https://jneem.github.io/merging/ https://pijul.org/model/#why-care-about-patch-theory Unfortunatly Gitless doesn't solve t
38.
▲
by
apichat
8y ago
Yes and PeerTube https://joinpeertube.org/en/ is fundrising to be improved : https://www.kisskissbankbank.com/en/projects/peertube-a-free... 20 000 € goal: PeerTube v1, clean and simple With
39.
▲
by
apichat
8y ago
You should also look at http://pijul.org
40.
▲
by
apichat
10y ago
> I've been running my own mail server since 1995, and I would not wish it on anyone. Yes but Internet still young and evolving. Here are modern solutions : 1) https://yunohost.org 2) http://cozy.io 3) http
41.
▲
by
apichat
10y ago
> solutions for the abuse problem A solution is using address like greeting@name (meaning localpart@dnspart) https://linuxfr.org/users/apichat/journaux/salut-toto-saluta... An other solution is the design
42.
▲
by
apichat
10y ago
> federated standard without control of client and server is going to evolve very slowly an fracture into incompatible pieces. Good answers : An Objection to ‘The ecosystem is moving’ https://gultsch.de/objection.html Ju
43.
▲
by
apichat
10y ago
Yes good explanations here : The State of Mobile XMPP in 2016 https://gultsch.de/xmpp_2016.html
44.
▲
by
apichat
10y ago
> Keeping a persistent connection to your server [...] is not a simple problem But is already solved. Explanations : "The State of Mobile XMPP in 2016" https://gultsch.de/xmpp_2016.html > Federation has the
45.
▲
by
apichat
10y ago
> They would simply censor access to all the XMPP providers First we already know this situation with email, and we see that as a federate protocol email is not censorable. At least not as easy to censor as Signal is. Secondly it's
46.
▲
by
apichat
10y ago
This French article may interest you. The maine purpose is to remove this usual semantic of email username@hostname and to replace it by greeting@name
47.
▲
Hello@jdoe – Greeting, editorial rules and name on Internet
(linuxfr.org)
2 points
by
apichat
10y ago
|
1 comments
48.
▲
by
apichat
10y ago
I agree.
49.
▲
by
apichat
10y ago
Universal unique canonical names are not a good thing because the problem of name squatting exists. It's why relative names and forkable registry is a good solution. But in some cultural context where a registry is mainstream, names ar
50.
▲
by
apichat
10y ago
Blockchain is not a good or secure technology to replace DNS. Gnu Name system is a good one. Here you can find a criticism of NameCoin and blockchain : http://seenthis.net/messages/358071
51.
▲
by
apichat
10y ago
Name registries still exist in GNS and they are still usefull but anyone can be a registry for anybody. So in a cultural context where a registry is mainstream, names are almost unique. But registries became contestable, you can avoid them