Universal unique canonical names are not a good thing because the problem of name squatting exists. It's why relative names and forkable registry is a good sol

Universal unique canonical names are not a good thing because the problem of name squatting exists. It's why relative names and forkable registry is a good solution. But in some cultural context where a registry is mainstream, names are almost unique. Here are some explanations : - http://seenthis.net/messages/358071 http://seenthis.net/messages/358071 - https://gnunet.org/sites/default/files/paper_cans2014_camera_ready.pdf https://gnunet.org/sites/default/files/paper_cans2014_camera... > 3.3 Relative Names for Transitivity of Delegations > Users can delegate control over a subdomain to another user’s zone by indicating this in a new record