anuramat

8 ms·

181.
by anuramat 1y ago
why would anyone want more non-determinism than absolutely necessary?
182.
by anuramat 1y ago
Fun fact -- the censor can't 1337 at all : 7H3 7!4NM3N 5QU4R3 1NC1D3N7 (1989) (>_<)7 1N JUN3 1989, 4|| 4RM0R3D V3H1CL3 (7-64 |/|41N 84TTL3 74NK) W45 5P0TT3D 0N 71AN4NM3N 5QU4R3 1N 83!J1NG, CH1N4. 7H15 W45 DUR1NG 7H3 PR0- D3
183.
by anuramat 1y ago
I suppose efficiency? It's easier to filter out petabytes of AI slop than to determine which human generated content is harmful
184.
by anuramat 1y ago
What exactly are your gripes with hooks, wdym by "transformational"? Regarding ubiquity, there's already quite a few repos with collections of hooks; I've only tried notifications and format-on-write so far, the only pro
185.
by anuramat 1y ago
> not opensource You can extract prompts with mitmproxy/netcat, and AFAIK there isn't much more to it (bash and todo list are all you need in terms of tools), there's already a lot of simpler tools with better ux: - sst&#x
186.
by anuramat 1y ago
with QM, the "unobservable" stuff is just guaranteed to not be there, eg a particle detected at (x,t) is definitely not at (x',t); so you are observing it "not existing there" -- collapse just makes the measurement
187.
by anuramat 1y ago
What's your point? We should be more careful with it? This is the "trial and error" part
188.
by anuramat 1y ago
Nobody knows what intelligence is, yet somehow everyone has a strong opinion on what it isn't; after all, how could piecewise affine transformations/markov chains/differential equations EVER do X?
189.
by anuramat 1y ago
What does "semi-random" even mean? Are humans not "semi-random" in the same sense?
190.
by anuramat 1y ago
meanwhile you're not even doing it statistically, you're just (deterministically) parroting the same argument that was already bad taste 10 years ago quantum mechanics is just linear algebra, chemistry is just quantum mechan
191.
by anuramat 1y ago
this is just wrong you could say "it's just matrix multiplication"; but then quantum mechanics (and thus chemistry, biology, and everything on top of that) is just linear algebra
192.
by anuramat 1y ago
> large language models work comparatively well with (programming) languages what else would they be good at
193.
by anuramat 1y ago
I wish claude-style imports ("general guidelines: @CONTRIBUTING.md") and bash execution ("available repositories: !`ghq list`") were a part of the spec Even claude supports bash commands only in slash prompts; you could
194.
by anuramat 1y ago
it's already read only outside of project directories (except for Bash tool); your only further option is to wrap it in a sandbox, `bwrap` is perfect for this "don't even think" is in the default system prompt, but it&#x
195.
by anuramat 1y ago
> wasn't the context yeah, I'm just curious about the vibe in general > good tests are there any downsides to adding "bad tests" though? as long as you keep generated tests separate, it's basically free regr
196.
by anuramat 1y ago
Opus 4.1: > how many times does letter R appear in the word “blueberry”? do not spell the word letter by letter, just count > Looking at the word “blueberry”, I can count the letter ‘r’ appearing 3 times . The R’s appear in positions
197.
by anuramat 1y ago
Literally every single one? To not mess it up, they either have to spell the word l-i-k-e t-h-i-s in the output/CoT first (which depends on the tokenizer counting every letter as a separate token), or have the exact question in the tra
198.
by anuramat 1y ago
Even for code reviews/test generation/documentation search?
199.
by anuramat 1y ago
I meant that we could be in the 19th century stage, not that we necessarily are > marketers of AI why would I ever consider their opinion to be valuable?
200.
by anuramat 1y ago
> full access to cli? yes > what makes it not perform rm -rf / by default -- regexes and prayers, but you're expected to use sandboxing
201.
by anuramat 1y ago
Did you try any diffusion models? They should be quick enough
202.
by anuramat 1y ago
I guess it depends on your definitions, but they did say "the same underlying model" https://x.com/openai/status/1932530423911096508
203.
by anuramat 1y ago
That's how BERT is trained, masked language modeling
204.
by anuramat 1y ago
if you treat it like stochastic software it is, how is 95% chance of one-shotting a problem not useful? I feel like the biggest problem most people have with LLMs is the "lack of accountability", and then the same people say &quot
205.
by anuramat 1y ago
> because there's no "I", in the LLM, no unified subject is there in humans? > Human beings are capable of are they? > without which the world would make no sense to us does it?
206.
by anuramat 1y ago
"real programmers use ed", 2025 edition: you're forever stuck with "junior stuff" if you let a language model handle language god forbid I don't have to read 10k lines of logs to fix a typo
207.
by anuramat 1y ago
sway works fine with nvidia, even though it's not supposed to
208.
by anuramat 1y ago
It's still GPT-5, just with the highest reasoning effort value
209.
by anuramat 1y ago
kinda how theoretical physics peaked in 1878, as predicted by Philipp von Jolly? why does everyone feel the urge to extrapolate a vibe-based metric based on three points? isn't scientific/technological progress inherently unpredic
210.
by anuramat 1y ago
maybe I'm biased, but python feels like endless boilerplate for unixy stuff also I'm mostly using it to prepare an interactive environment anyway, so I don't see alternatives for my usecase (maybe zellij, but they don't

More ›