Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
antran22
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
antran22
5mo ago
Elder [0] and Younger [1] Futhark (or Fuþark) are the name of two runic writing systems used by Germanic and Scandinavian Vikings. The name Futhark is a combination of the first 6 runes /f/, /u/, /ð/, /ɑ&#
32.
▲
by
antran22
5mo ago
why wouldn't you want to see your htop output on a moebius strip
33.
▲
by
antran22
10mo ago
I'm just wondering if there is any real modern pocket cyberdeck with the form factor of those old phones, with a slide out physical keyboard.
34.
▲
by
antran22
10mo ago
in that case, they should make it optional. What some might find as eye candy, other finds as nuisance (case in point, animation).
35.
▲
Show HN: A dead-simple CV generator using Typst typesetter
(antran22.xyz)
1 points
by
antran22
2y ago
|
0 comments
36.
▲
by
antran22
2y ago
I checked this out and I gotta say it is still in a very early stage. The features they are presenting seem nice, but not very usable, with a lot of rough edges. Then I found this issue, where essentially they left a huge backdoor open with
37.
▲
Gowebly: A tool to bootstrap an web application in Golang
(github.com)
1 points
by
antran22
2y ago
|
0 comments
38.
▲
by
antran22
2y ago
I sincerely hope that Apple don't pull a Recall move, because at that moment I'll be forced to migrate off the ecosystem (maybe I'll install Asahi Linux on my M-series machine). So thank you, Apple, for not running in this ar
39.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
In the case of a serious attack, the blacklist should be every token. You can still handle this quite nicely with JWT by rotating the previous verification key. Depends on systems and configuration, this can be as easy as changing the HMAC
40.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
JWT doesn't encrypt (by default) the payload. The header & payload is passed through base64 and appended with a hash to produce a JWT. JWT verifying doesn't require making API call, and is essentially a hash check. Any verifie
41.
▲
CSS Arts using only background gradient on a single div element
(a.singlediv.com)
3 points
by
antran22
3y ago
|
0 comments
42.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
I worked with some platforms that does. However, those usually position themselves as a code generator more than a full application builder. - Amplication: Last I checked, they allow defining data structure & endpoints etc. before expor
43.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
Thanks for building Windmill. I spin up a test instance and was blown away by the well-designed-ness. I'm looking to investigate using Windmill as a website builder for some small internal system. Few questions: - Is it possible to set
44.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
You are saying "gross omission" like this is some Python script, like they are skipping the else clause for a condition. Imagine trying to land a plane that is flying at Mach 2, with no direct control, only a video feed with 4 sec
45.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
It's a piece of example code to demo a concept. You are asking people to error check a something akin to a curl call in a bash command.
46.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
Honestly, BBC is writing a very clickbaity title. They have only been on NASDAQ one day. Vinfast is not going to topple Tesla or Ford or GM in the next few days. Context: I'm a Vietnamese and worked on one of the Vinfast subproject at
47.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
IMO it's not Jira's fault (although I hate Jira with a burning passion). It's the problem of management trying to force their opinionated certainty on a very uncertain process of software development. One of my past team used
48.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
I agree with your opinion. The problem is that managers have the notion of software estimation as a "craft". It should not be considered a craft at all, and once you held estimation to the importance of being a "craft",
49.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
I have absolutely no knowledge in mechanical engineering before and I am now really in a youtube-binge about wrench. Not sure it is a good thing that I can get captivated by absolute random topic or a bad thing because how technology just s
50.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
Sorry friend, WordPress already beat you to it: https://github.com/WordPress/wordpress-playground
51.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
Ah but that's not what I am referring to. If you take a look at Vercel Postgres page [^0], you will see that Vercel is marketing a new way of writing server side rendered code, where you can write SQL code right next to the HTML-ish co
52.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
> everything is repeated every six months to two years Same feeling looking at the new Vercel SQL library. Oh wow now you can write SQL right next to your client-facing code, such convenient. You have just rediscovered PHP. To be fair, f
53.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
Is there any rationale behind the decision of publishing this exclusively as an extension? Why is it not possible to just provide a public webform. I want to try it out but it doesn't support Firefox yet.
54.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
I mean, that's a very specific example of looking at it. But let me try and rationalize it: - Books are not purely consumption. Rather, working through a good book is a very good creative exercise, because you are "creating"
55.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
Even if it is a terrible tool for my purpose, I'd still want my kids to try (under my supervision) and find out the correct way to use it. Then they will be able to judge for themselves the pitfall of those tools. But yeah, my kid will
56.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
But to what end? What more can you do with a printed envelop? ROT13 or Vignère that piece of text? Then write it with the Dancing Men alphabet? The point is, you can only mitigate so much before it become an exercise in futility. The genera
57.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
IMHO, the key thing that we need to do is to teach our kids how to create "things" instead of just "consuming". This is important no matter which era you are in, but the average 15th century kid didn't have that man
58.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
I would like to first sympathize with you. That is a crappy situation to be in. I also agree, "deliberate" is a bit too strongly worded. So in order to lose the domain, there is just a very few modes of failure that has a 3rd part
59.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
You are still not looking at the definition of"domain name" in my context: the ownership context. I totally agree with you on the technical side, in most technical context a root-level domain or subdomain is largely the same thing
60.
▲
by
antran22
3y ago
You misunderstood the definition of domain in my context. In terms of ownership, if I tell you I am owning a domain, I am owning something along the format of "${name}.${tld}". I can't say that I own the domain of "exa
More ›