Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
antoniojtorres
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
They aren’t sad about being forced to use something. They are expressing their opinion about split efforts in the Django community.
62.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
I don’t think the comment was meant derisive like you and the other commenter are interpreting… relax?
63.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
I’m not sure how this comment meets the rules of engaging in meaningful discussion
64.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
I agree with your point and response. This activity of being players overs to new leagues run by Saudi or adjacent countries has been huge in almost every major sport. Some with much more success than others.
65.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
This was at the center of controversy many years ago, described as a sort of alt-right pipeline. I believe there are studies about that exact algorithm behavior on youtube. My understanding is that it was changed to loop back around to trus
66.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
I’m a val.town user and townie has been really nice in conjunction with having stuff working and hosted right away, it hits the sweet spot for speed and flexibility. Tough call to make on whether to continue pursuing it, excited to see what
67.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
This string of unprovable assumptions is not how you do things.
68.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
That person on the reddit example is as caustic as can be. Perfect example of a nightmare open source user.
69.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
Is that supposed to mean that no banner and thus no consent is somehow better?
70.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
What’s wrong with channel 1?
71.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
This worries me from a positioning standpoint. I imagine a large amount of people with a garden bed, even a large one, garden because they like it, this would get in the way of that. The device doesn’t appear like it would scale well to any
72.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
That is a fantastic idea, I wonder why they didn’t take on it, did they say why?
73.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
I enjoyed that video, thanks for sharing!
74.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
de
75.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
I agree. It’s funny to think of the gap between safety and scary when talking about turbulence. Large planes can take an absolute beating and be completely fine, but it could feel like the end of the world inside.
76.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
I don’t think this system would be positioned within artillery range, that seems negligent as it’s stationary. It seems like this system would be deployed protecting bases and other high value targets, at least according to their promo mate
77.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
There are more constructive ways of saying that.
78.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
This hits the point exactly, it’s an extension of stuff like Google’s zero click results, they are regurgitating a website’s content with no benefit to the website. I would say though, it feels like the training argument may ultimately lead
79.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
Newbie question, if the cores share an L3 cache, does that factor in the branch prediction vulnerabilities? Or is the data affected by the vulnerability stay in caches closer to the individual core? I assume so otherwise all cores would be
80.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
That’s typically the question with all marketing (probably cherry-picked) benchmarks. Have to wait until independent reviewers get their hands on them.
81.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
I would hope the threshold that has to be crossed for the alert functionality to trigger is more than a few minutes of proximity. Both items would have to move to together to weed out false positives, otherwise you’d set everything off at a
82.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
Ugh
83.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
2y ago
That’s an interesting thought, I think it certainly would’ve helped if they took a more “we build it as we go if you believe in the vision” approach. Reminds me of tesla and it’s approach, though that’s a pretty polarizing example.
84.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
3y ago
It is indeed different, the interesting nuance is that the difference is permitting advertising interest based tracking vs non-personalized lower yield ads if you decline the cookie banner. It’s interesting to see that the money without ser
85.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
3y ago
It’s a compliance checkbox for the most part I think. They can stay on top of new legislation by claiming they are providing tools to deal with misinformation, whereas it’d be easier to say that they are encouraging the proliferation of mis
86.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
3y ago
I couldn’t write any other type of code if I tried
87.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
3y ago
Didn’t this present it’s own set of issues for StackOverflow? I remember there being some large events surrounding very powerful community moderators
88.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
3y ago
Today I learned about the diving reflex and why it’s helpful to dunk your face in cold water. It can help with anxiety according to my therapist.
89.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
3y ago
Why don’t you ask for a source?
90.
▲
by
antoniojtorres
3y ago
Very much. We ended up writing our own queries to try and figure out where the costs were coming from in BQ. Ultimately we decided to offload as much as possible to a self-managed ClickHouse cluster.
More ›