anthumchris

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by anthumchris 12y ago

   Yes, not technically real-world, but hopefully enough to push decision makers to start encrypting. I also added a param to reduce images loaded: http://www.httpvshttps.com/?images=100 From my testing, SPDY was generally 60
2. 2.▲
   by anthumchris 12y ago

   No caching, and it's definitely http vs spdy, however, it's a global security initiative to get more people to encrypt.
3. 3.▲
   by anthumchris 12y ago

   for the client
4. 4.▲
   by anthumchris 12y ago

   Ha. My apologies, wasn't expecting so much traffic. Fixed now.
5. 5.▲
   by anthumchris 12y ago

   I increased the NGINX/ubuntu ulimit and work_connections, so you should see a fast test now without errors. Not prioritizing one protocol vs the other, I promise.
6. 6.▲
   by anthumchris 12y ago

   Yes, I was trying to increase worldwide security awareness.
7. 7.▲
   by anthumchris 12y ago

   Sorry, everyone. I'm the site's author, and I increased the ulimit and worker_connections to 4096, so you should see better perfomance and no more errors now. My apologies...I'm a web guy, not a networking guy. Rookie mista