Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
anthonygd
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
We might be talking about different things then. Or maybe not. You want people in government making long term strategic decisions that steer society. They should be listening to the will of the people as to what direction to steer it. I hop
32.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Which is fair, but also don't assume everyone is addicted because you are. Don't assume everyone is trapped by their addictions because you are. Most of all, don't try to legislate away everyone's freedoms because you ha
33.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
> In the particular case, they should not hire directly from the very industry they regulate. Ensuring that the regulators have expertise will be a problem, but at least no conflict of interest That feels like trading a problem for an ev
34.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
> It’s literally as simple as not putting a cigarette in your mouth and smoking it. Literally the approach I used when I quit smoking. > Crazy thought but what if we had a sample size bigger than you. Well, that sounds like something
35.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Realistically if you just want to try out someone else's contract in a safe environment, the existence of the test nets is entirely irrelevant. The contract is going to be at a different address, all the accounts involved are entirely
36.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Well, I'm guessing irony is lost on that group so I'll concede the point. Reminds me of the Rick & Morty sign for "peace among worlds".
37.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
I realize it's probably too late to respond, but I don't completely disagree. I really don't like referring to Republican's as conservative or Democrats as liberal precisely because neither party really sticks to those c
38.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Are you sure it's actually been used unironically? I've wondered about that, but don't personally know anyone who's used it in any way. Are you on good enough terms with an actual white supremist who has used it unironic
39.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
You're right. A conservative is a contrarian. They fight change. Chesterton's fence is a rational argument in favor of being conservative.
40.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
It felt overly authoritarian to me as well, but I think that's part of the point. In all the examples the author did have the authority to say no. In any sort of leadership position you should absolutely take advice and talk to people,
41.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
All the things you mention are problems. The stakes are high and the chance of a mistake is as well.
42.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
FWIW - When I've used washer-drier combos I haven't enjoy the convenience of discovering my clothes are all damp. They just don't dry well, so the do-it-all-while-away convenience is only true maybe 50% of the time. The other
43.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Why do you suspect blinders? Do you know of many cases where the disruptor pattern should be used by isn't?
44.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
It seems like such as clear cut example of how "bad people" think though. They always considered themselves justified in harming others. Variations of "the golden rule" are common around the world. If you actively decide
45.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Doesn't seem fundamentally different from any other PR firm. They tend to specialize in clients leaning in one direction or the other, but don't have specific interests beyond revenue. The page showing their work ( https:/&#x
46.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
I'm always confused when I see these sorts of comments. You're so concerned with ethics, while having no qualms about lying and stealing? Ethics are optional when personal benefit is involved?
47.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Is this something you have any firsthand experience with?
48.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
My assumption is that Apple exposes an API or page that can validate a gift card. If someone physically sees that card at Target and is then able to poll Apple with the number, that could go a long way towards enabling a scam. All the scamm
49.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Feels like a clear cut answer: Yes.
50.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
> You should try to reconsider what you think you know about the people who disagree with you, because you are absolutely incorrect and borderline delusional. You are doing exactly what you're insulting. Some self reflection is in o
51.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
> Who makes that decision? In a democracy, the people do, via the government they elect. So, you're proposing people don't form opinions or try to influence opinion? You're just arguing for maintaining the status quo here.
52.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
In what way are you saying we steal from the poor? How does bitcoin steal less?
53.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
I'm not sure if there's anything 95% of developers are on the same page about. From what I've seen, every company has a different idea of what _best practices_ are. Generally comes down to what some influential developer like
54.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Depends what you mean by end well... I'm sure everyone that counts will declare it a wonderful success. They'll probably even have graphs proving a x% reduction in Bad Stuff (TM)*.
55.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
In my experience those claiming to "sit and wait" have all been vaccinated now. After they waited a month or two and saw minimal side effects.
56.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Dear god no... if your sense of morality requires lying, you need to reevaluate some things. Thank you for not lying.
57.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
It's more accurate to say you depend on the teaching/explaining talent in addition to code talent. Why is that a problem? I've never heard anything as helpful for learning as the Feynman technique: https://fs.blog&
58.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Trials also need incentive. Everything does. Is your answer is to nationalize everything? If not, where do you draw the line? The world doesn't work the way you want it to and you're not making a real argument that it should. More
59.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
Are you saying risk-adverse is a bad thing?
60.
▲
by
anthonygd
5y ago
The healthcare industry does a lot of really shady things, but you're picking the worst example. No doubt drugs could be cheaper, but denying pharma an incentive to ever develop them is not the answer. Of course manufacturing is cheap,
More ›