anthem2025

8 ms·

31.
by anthem2025 1y ago
They are trying to give credibility to as value-less asset that’s historically been used for illegal activity, gambling, and predatory selling of said assets to people who don’t understand them. Tether claiming they have the ability to back
32.
by anthem2025 1y ago
I’ll believe in stable coins when tether passes an audit. Actually even then I still consider it nonsense.
33.
by anthem2025 1y ago
Less convincing when you open up by gushing about every other lame AI tech then proceed to insist that this new thing is the real revolution. Comes across as someone who just wants to shill for AI for some reason.
34.
by anthem2025 1y ago
Because they have a history of abusing their monopoly on browsers to push new standards that only help them.
35.
by anthem2025 1y ago
According to scotus they can just give the judge a thank you gift for doing such a good job.
36.
by anthem2025 1y ago
What states rights, he’s invading cities in flagrant violation of laws and norms.
37.
by anthem2025 1y ago
It speaks to the credibility of the people involved when they claim to protect journalists.
38.
by anthem2025 1y ago
Republicans do disagree on all the things you listed. Every single fucking one. They are actively working to destroy as much environmental regulation as they can and further the interests of fossil fuel corporations.
39.
by anthem2025 1y ago
So already overburdened teachers can have to deal with flunking half the class and parents getting mad at them for it?
40.
by anthem2025 1y ago
Why criticize the employees when you have no clue what their day to day is like? There’s a reason why leadership and the leadership principles are mocked. They vary from okay to kinda dumb to just outright silly. > they could probably co
41.
by anthem2025 1y ago
Are you really trying to argue Tesla is fairly valued? In 2025? When their sales have nosedived, new products have flopped, their CEO is the most disliked man in America, and their self driving still requires someone in the car at all times
42.
by anthem2025 1y ago
I doubt it. Some will be used a lot will be written off and tossed away.
43.
by anthem2025 1y ago
She was selected because he promised a woman of color and she was the obvious choice from that pool.
44.
by anthem2025 1y ago
These people would willingly expose their child to diseases that cause death or lifelong health problems. They are not fit parents.
45.
by anthem2025 1y ago
More likely they continue with the policies that just destroyed the CDC. More likely they continue to go forward with policy based on petty grievances because they are fascist morons who want to see people die.
46.
by anthem2025 1y ago
I’d characterize it as someone who wants to defund mRNA research, because that’s literally what you said he wants to do. But I’m not a fascist trying to justify the total destruction of the CDC anti-vaxxer dipshits.
47.
by anthem2025 1y ago
Biden literally campaigned on “nothing will fundamentally change”. Why would people think his VP would suddenly be different. Add in her proven unpopularity and the fact that they didn’t run a primary and you have a perfect recipe for a tot
48.
by anthem2025 1y ago
How exactly do you presume to make an argument about thought and whether or an LLM exhibits genuine thought and intelligence without philosophy? Not to mention the effect of formal logic in computer science
49.
by anthem2025 1y ago
It doesn’t develop any thinking, it’s just predicting tokens based on a statistical model. This has been demonstrated so many times. They don’t make mistakes. It doesn’t make any sense to claim they do because their goal is simply to produc
50.
by anthem2025 1y ago
We see massive initial growth followed by a slowdown constantly. There is zero reason to think AI is some exception that will continue to exponentially improve without limit. We already seem to be at the point of diminishing returns. Sinkin
51.
by anthem2025 1y ago
And as people get more used to the patterns of AI it’s getting called out more and more.
52.
by anthem2025 1y ago
Did they have people who have built an OS before? I’ve seen this firsthand. These giant tech companies try to just jump into a massive new project thinking that because they have built such an impressive website and have so much experience
53.
by anthem2025 1y ago
limited liability has been a disaster for the entire human race.
54.
by anthem2025 1y ago
Yes, I spent years working on exactly that. I personally was working with a compiler team to validate changes to eliminate non-determinism. That’s why I felt qualified to make the statement I did. It’s non trivial because you have to back t
55.
by anthem2025 1y ago
I don’t disagree, but was Louisiana chosen because it offers cheap energy/cooling/infra or because the government doesn’t bother to ask questions about the impact to thinks like energy and water usage (which is why we are seeing m
56.
by anthem2025 1y ago
No, it’s just an attempt to pretend wrong outputs are some special case when really they aren’t. They aren’t imagine something that doesn’t exist they are just running the same process they do for everything else and it just didn’t work. If
57.
by anthem2025 1y ago
Isn’t that why people argue against calling them hallucinations? It implies that some parts of the output aren’t hallucinations, when the reality is that none of it has any thought behind it.
58.
by anthem2025 1y ago
It’s not trivial largely because we didn’t bother to design deterministic builds because it didn’t seem to matter. There is not much about the actual problem that makes it difficult.
59.
by anthem2025 1y ago
It’s funny how people acknowledge the railroads and the similarity to AI, but then jump back to comparing it to the internet when it comes to drawing conclusions. The internet build out left massive amounts of useful infrastructure. The rai
60.
by anthem2025 1y ago
Yeah immediate thought was “well one is US intelligence” Realistically, one is US intelligence and the other is US military.

More ›