anth_anm

10 ms·

91.
by anth_anm 8y ago
It's stock increases.
92.
by anth_anm 8y ago
It's not so much compensate as much as it is structuring their comp so that they can get away with never actually giving you a raise.
93.
by anth_anm 8y ago
According to the itnernet if you aren't making that by 35, you're a failure.
94.
by anth_anm 8y ago
Yes, but it's less stupid than the alternatives.
95.
by anth_anm 8y ago
Compare it to what microsoft spent before their anti-trust lawsuits.
96.
by anth_anm 8y ago
Don't care, my system is still better.
97.
by anth_anm 8y ago
My design uses paper and pen. Deployment requires mailing ballots out and having places where people can come in to fill them out. 10 million dollars please.
98.
by anth_anm 8y ago
The counterargument is we could just not write them off.
99.
by anth_anm 8y ago
> HBO Go/Now are fine. Not really, they are lousy apps. You can fix that without engaging in the "spew content and see waht sticks" style of netflix.
100.
by anth_anm 8y ago
"we have lots of compute resources and access to software, aren't we awesome?"
101.
by anth_anm 8y ago
and UBI is an excuse to write off the bottom half the population. All 3 are popular with the HN crowd. Not surprising.
102.
by anth_anm 8y ago
Change the rules please. or don't and I'm giving Matt Christman a dollar.
103.
by anth_anm 8y ago
I worked for a team that did maintain a fork. It was an insane amount of effort just to keep up with the commits going in.
104.
by anth_anm 8y ago
Microsoft nearly got broken up for a much weaker version of this sort of rule.
105.
by anth_anm 8y ago
It's absurd to complain about pocket and use it as an excuse to use a browser made by fucking google.
106.
by anth_anm 8y ago
Google pays their bribes. Microsoft didn't.
107.
by anth_anm 8y ago
> The rendering and JavaScript engines do not impact privacy. Actually they absolutely do. You need to do mitigations against fingerprinting in order to protect privacy.
108.
by anth_anm 8y ago
> Chromium is 99% OSS OSS but owned totally by google. I don't believe such a product should get any credit for being OSS. It will never do what the community wants.
109.
by anth_anm 8y ago
Wider AGPL use would fall under aggressive license changes, IMO.
110.
by anth_anm 8y ago
I'm not going to use FOSS that doesn't have a strong community around, at least not for anything major.
111.
by anth_anm 8y ago
I've got a Mustang and I'd like something mch smaller.
112.
by anth_anm 8y ago
So you would rather it be controlled by a very anti-open source for profit corporation nstead?
113.
by anth_anm 8y ago
AWS, in the short term. In the long term their actions make it impossible to build any sort of business based directly on FOSS. You have to do support, or hosting, or something else. Guess what, AWS has a lot more money to do both of those
114.
by anth_anm 8y ago
They just said "Fuck you, we have more money so we own you now".
115.
by anth_anm 8y ago
Okay, are you glad that Amazon now owns Elasticsearch?
116.
by anth_anm 8y ago
> software that you build with it, other than applications. I'm no lawyer, but this sounds like complete nonsense.
117.
by anth_anm 8y ago
> It makes smaller scale open source more commercially viable because you won't attract the attention of the providers that would come in a take your business. Small scale open source isn't technologically viable. > In the p
118.
by anth_anm 8y ago
I think Amazon does a much bigger disservice. > but enough open source will ensure that software licensing is not a sustainable model to seek rent So your solution to this is to just make it so no one can make money doing work. Except Je
119.
by anth_anm 8y ago
Then maybe FOSS was a mistake.
120.
by anth_anm 8y ago
You're incredibly naive and I hope you don't end up feeling screwed over by one of the big companies in a few years.

More ›