ansin

6 ms·

31.
by ansin 18y ago
-> "the largest issues I've run into with Ruby typically deal with people trying to be too clever" I agree with you about Thought-to-Code and even though I argued in favor of monkey patching earlier, the willingness to use it without di
32.
by ansin 18y ago
->"I assume if there were more people coding Ruby, there would be a better chance someone would step up and take his place." Is it more the fact that the community is small or that fewer people share their code than in the Python commun
33.
by ansin 18y ago
Out of curiosity, what has your experience been like? Do you have any major gripes with the language or are you still on a Ruby honeymoon?
34.
by ansin 18y ago
How do you deal with excess verbosity in C#? I know this is a separate argument from the monkey patching issue but for me the conciseness and elegance of the Ruby syntax versus C# is the primary reason to choose Ruby.
35.
by ansin 18y ago
Why? Because of monkey patching, syntax, performance, the community or some other reason such as you prefer Python or have an intuitive, ineffable and unexpressable disklike of the language or because Matz is from Japan and they bombed Pear
36.
by ansin 18y ago
Just because it's a satire doesn't mean the title in incorrect. I would argue that Ruby is, in fact, the future for the same reason that Python is the future. As for monkey patching, yes, it's ill-advised in general just as global scope and
37.
Ask HN: Best Django jobs sites?
1 points by ansin 18y ago|0 comments