Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
anovikov
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
271.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
I guess that's the point of it. It's kinda hard to doubt what they're saying anw.
272.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
It doesn't work properly anyway anymore...
273.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
Wait wait wasn't it wholly on Trump's payroll as the dems say?
274.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
Why is there no European alternative to Apple app store? It's rather strange to me.
275.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
This is good. But because societies are democratic, and most voters are now economically irrelevant, something has to be done about possibility to create discontent simply to shake things and weaken countries - because there is nothing this
276.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
So now they will run waves through the property market by recommending people to buy, then to sell, in 3-6 month intervals, skimming off the market each time?
277.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
When the answer is not general but particular - "better" or "worse" can be about many things including entirely non-quantifiable and subjective ones like "moral virtue" - but when it's about economy, it&#x
278.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
Y Combinator founders, and proper startup founders in general are not outsiders. They aren't, and never been, Upwork customers, and in fact every sane VC will reject a startup that uses any sort of outsourcing to build their offering,
279.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
I'm within top 40 Upwork freelancers by lifetime revenue and at one point was #11. Directly and indirectly extracted around $15M there. It's dead. Noting to look at. It's not AI or interest rates, as it seems, the very dream
280.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
The only thing that can objectively reduce waste is well, simplifying access to people's data/surveillance capitalism. This way corps will have a better idea of what people want to wear and at which price they are willing to buy i
281.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
This text looks like it was written by AI. But i have every reason to believe that it wasn't. Is it just me, or many people got into habit of writing in "ChatGPT-style" simply because talking to ChatGPT is how they spend most
282.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
Because they only got there first time around because of Kennedy's promise after he was shot. It didn't take a moon landing to win the Space Race - by that point Soviets already exhausted their potential gained by surprise and tro
283.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
They are losing and they know it.
284.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
People there are tech savvy, trying to push them into government-sponsored spyware will backfire, as they just won't be using "normal" internet at all soon. Phones are sold with VPNs preinstalled so all apps work even for gra
285.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
Fun observation! A similar thing existed in Soviet movies: villains usually spoke with Ukrainian accent.
286.
▲
by
anovikov
8mo ago
Are these for the purpose of selling to non-Brits right? "Being British is supposed to be classy and surely not associated with Trump as much as being an American"? That might work, but not for selling to Brits because they expect
287.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
That it limits local flights but not international ones as they fly higher.
288.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
Good days of gambling are long since over. There was a lot of easy money to make there from ~2000 (when online gambling properly became a thing - i only heard about it, i joined in 2004 myself) through ~2012 (on a massive scale) and in some
289.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
Well, it's only those who were caught. I think it's not as much about age but simply because markets for most things have matured and you almost can't get ahead without scamming someone - and it gives small businesses a lever
290.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
That's incredible! Smoking is the hardest one of them. Mainly because smokers tend to be skinny, as cigs kill your appetite (unlike alcoholics who tend to be fat) and all GLP-1 effects go together with the weight loss. Congrats. Smokin
291.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
Well, i don't get what the debate is even for? AI is bad? true. Can we get around it? No. No amount of hand-waving is going to un-invent it.
292.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
We live in a "good enough" era after all.
293.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
I don't agree about containers, they are a really handy tool to produce stable(-ish) deployments. Blockchain is probably the best single tool to do what software was designed to do since invented as a separate industry - scam people ou
294.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
Well, in a nutshell that is undeniable. Pensioners don't work. Other people fund them. No matter how it is calculated - whether through ownership of assets, direct government obligation, or otherwise - that product consumed by pensione
295.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
Only old people can be concerned with this question. I look at the young and they already have no concept of "dignity through labour". That's an industrial era relic.
296.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
All ads are scams. That's life. Only children and the elderly click on them anyway, and they are optimised to be clicked on by those since otherwise it just doesn't work at all. More to that - many of the ads today aren't eve
297.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
But there's absurd amount of crime... Best hospitals, true, but Israel has same or better ones and they are much cheaper too. Which again isn't a valid reason to live there let alone not to get citizenship. For any kind of acute&#
298.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
People with cash don't work for salary. You can travel without citizenship too.
299.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
It exists everywhere, why not? Apart from countries with wealth tax but these are rare exceptions. As for taxation of income derived from business, these are either completely or mostly tax-exempt in many EU countries (Cyprus, Malta, Greece
300.
▲
by
anovikov
9mo ago
Question is - why would anyone with cash immigrate to US? Doing business there does not require citizenship. What is it more than doing business that attracts people if one has a citizenship of just about any first world country? I mean, Am
More ›