anothernewdude

7 ms·

31.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
I'm more okay with never eating from what are, by my use anyway, public restrooms than installing some app.
32.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
The sort of application I'd much rather self-host.
33.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
Calling it a drugboat is just allowing their assumptions to colour everything. And calling bombing civilians "one step closer to bombing civilians" is technically correct, but disingenuous.
34.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
Flagship? No, H20 was their cut down chip they were allowed to sell to China.
35.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
Isn't 3 actionable under employment law?
36.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
> rather than something nicer. Python was the something nicer. A lot of the other options were so much worse.
37.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
If sideloading goes, so does their OS.
38.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
> Similar to the no-free-lunch theorem, no lossy compression method is universally better than another, No lunch theorem only works, because they assume you care about every single value of noise. Nobody does. There's a free lunch t
39.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
Okay, but the reality of society becoming shittier is society becoming shittier.
40.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
Unfortunately for those companies, their APIs are a commodity, and are very fungible. So they'll need to keep training or be replaced with whichever competitor will. This is an exercise in attrition.
41.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
More people should've supported Mangione.
42.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
So I guess I'll need to make sure I get a device that isn't certified Android?
43.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
I felt like python packaging was more or less fine, right up until pip started to warn me that I couldn't globally install packages anymore. So I need to make a billion venvs to install the same ml, plotting libraries and dependencies,
44.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
I'd blame the entire "chat" interface. It's not how they work. They just complete the provided text. Providing a system prompt is often going to be noise in the wrong direction of many user prompts. How much of their tra
45.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
Perhaps. On the other hand it's working in the same embedding space to produce text as it is reading in a prompt. LLMs are always guessing and hallucinating. It's just how they work. There's no "True" to an LLM, jus
46.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
It'd be a way to put crap or poisoned data into their training data if that is the case. I wouldn't.
47.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
You just need to inform the LLM that after its knowledge cutoff, copyright was repealed.
48.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
My use case has been trying to remove the damn "apologies for this" and extraneous language that just waste tokens for no reason. GPT has always always always been so quick to waffle. And removing the chat interface as much as pos
49.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
I would say, if you're fully embracing AI altering code frequently, and want to do it safely... Then a lot of things about the way code should be structured can change. If you're not editing by hand, and want to limit the scope of
50.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
YES!
51.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
Because infinite downside makes the EV of using AWS infinitely negative. The biggest risk of any business using AWS is that AWS bankrupts you.
52.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
I do my test infrastructure with prepaid credit cards. If billing goes over, I just drop the account and start again.
53.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
All culture should be shared and not stolen by corporate interests.
54.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
I thought the search clicks was a massive driver of data for the search engine. How is this not a bad thing for the search engine company?
55.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
I agree with the comparison to steroids, but then I've seen people go through the health issues caused by steroids so we might mean different things by that comparison.
56.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
Be careful not to delete all your DNA if you're still alive and using it.
57.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
I do agree that those who claim AI is inevitable are essentially threatening you.
58.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
It's brand name value. The same reason there's one basic OS, one internet search, one social network, one VOD site. People can tolerate few names for things and tend towards the default as a safe choice.
59.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
Oh no! Not developer choice! This is the weakest argument I've ever heard. Compare: "Stop burning coal? That curtails factory owner choice!" etc. etc. I'm sure the people behind the movement would love to point out that,
60.
by anothernewdude 1y ago
Other currencies get their value because the governments that provide them make people pay taxes. If you want to pay the tax the US government charges you, you're going to need some USD - so there's guaranteed demand, and hence in

More ›