Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
anotherbrownguy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
121.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
The "backlash" was from former Democrats who were brainwashed for decades to hate the blacks who then decided to support the Republican party as a revenge because they felt betrayed by the Democratic Party when they switched their
122.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
Non-American businesses and corporations which depend on intelligent manpower should be more worried because of the proposed changes, not less. The entire point of immigration reform is to make it merit-based i.e. the most promising candida
123.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
Doesn't explain why Republicans freed the slaves and Democrats fought for 60 years to bring it back... but whatever floats your boat. I wish you best of luck to your trip to Mars. Hope it is one way.
124.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
What IP theft? Are there instances where Chinese Patent Office failed to act against IP theft claims?
125.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
>but rather than being used for profit to be used for the benefit of workers and mankind in general. Why does it have to be one or the other? Why can't some companies profit for benefiting mankind? In fact, why would anyone bother p
126.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
THIS. If richer people can automate their lifestyles, the companies selling automation technologies would definitely sell these automation technologies cheaply to the masses (specially given that because of automation, mass producing automa
127.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
They were not published by the guest, which suggests some ill intent on her part.
128.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
What would you educate people to do? For example, getting a degree in Library Science with hopes of becoming a librarian would definitely not help them get a job because people are moving to digital delivery for books and this will only inc
129.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
>The impact of automation will be far worse for the individual in society than the impact of globalization. I have found this sentiment very common but I haven't heard a good enough argument to support it. If we banned all sorts of
130.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
>dropping phrases as overtly racist as hers Which "words" are we talking about? Had she avoided saying "one word: Asian", this would not have been a story.
131.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
It is missing some messages right before the racist remarks.
132.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
>So you think this person is racist, but that they don't act like it? No, I think this person is not racist, but acted like one in the heat of the argument. >You're assuming that they wouldn't have treated a white perso
133.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
She had approved knowing the race of the person so the reason she cancelled was definitely not racist. I think she was just stupid enough to make those remarks and I hope she is being punished for that. Otherwise, this is wrong.
134.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
Message transcript and full story here: https://www.everipedia.com/tami-barker-airbnb-host/ I agree with OP. The woman was stupid enough to use racist remarks but the reasons she cancelled the reservation was definitel
135.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
I don't see how that makes China different from any other country.
136.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
>it's obvious why China is not trustworthy (i.e. rampant product piracy) What kind of piracy? Patents and copyrights are managed and enforced at the state level.
137.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
Constitution of China also gives citizens freedom of speech, freedom of press etc. It's not criminalized. It's just that if you say something damaging, they will find something else that you violated for which you have to go to ja
138.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
>Give your data/source to a domestic competitor? Because they would absolutely do that. Are there known instances of this happening? How do you know they would "absolutely do that"?
139.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
>actively policing speech Yes, "speech" that is illegal because it is damaging to the ruling class. See: Snowden, Manning, Assange.
140.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
Why? What will Chinese government do to you that American government wont?
141.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
I think the new trend is defending it.
142.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
I fail to see this as a problem. I would be completely fine if I hadn't learnt about theory of evolution in school. Why does anyone who does not work in a field that requires the knowledge of evolution need to know about it? It's
143.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
Let's not forget that solar cannot be used for anything critical where reliability is expected. It requires backup from a reliable source to be practical.
144.
▲
by
anotherbrownguy
9y ago
>2. Cheap imports from China. Start using Aliexpress and you have one less reason to use Ebay.