Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
anon291
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
331.
▲
by
anon291
7mo ago
Financial illiteracy will be the end of democracy
332.
▲
by
anon291
7mo ago
America operates on a strong executive common law system not whatever system you are imagining. I took business law more than a decade ago and the professor basically said do what you want (money wise) if you can pay for it. This is the Eng
333.
▲
by
anon291
7mo ago
England's 'democracy' is cool insofar as the freemasons are cool. Old men in goofy hats sound fun until they end up raping some kid on an island somewhere in their old colonial posessions.
334.
▲
by
anon291
7mo ago
Ah yes, the country whose supreme court struck down its global tariffs and then forced the federal government into refunding all the money back is truly no longer bound by its own laws.
335.
▲
by
anon291
7mo ago
> Because people who believe things like that have to twist around their worldview to such an extreme that its impossible for them to be competent no matter how smart or how much education they have. Extremely well said
336.
▲
by
anon291
7mo ago
Well yeah... You do the initial encryption yourself by whatever means you trust
337.
▲
by
anon291
7mo ago
Math literacy needs to become standard for computer scientists. These takes are so bad
338.
▲
by
anon291
7mo ago
If it were as fast as a normal chip, it would obviate the need
339.
▲
by
anon291
7mo ago
I mean, no they cannot be viewed at any point once encrypted unless you have the key. That's the point. Even the intermediate steps are random gibberish unless you have the key
340.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
3 lines of code that may need to change is much more complex than a macro that signals intent.
341.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
Trump admins censorship is just as bad as Bidens. We need an administration that doesn't abuse the power of the government in the free market
342.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
Without defining what 'actuality' is, then there's no meaning to 'the Schrodinger equation holds in actuality'. In their own way, all interpretations of quantum mechanics claim the Schrodinger equation holds in 
343.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
Many worlds is not the Schrodinger equation. No I don't think this is many worlds. The decision is made uniquely and then is amplified.
344.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
To be totally frank, Islam is the odd one out. You can call it 'Western' values or 'Christian' values or whatever in order to make it seem chauvinistic all you want, but the simple truth is that these values are often sh
345.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
Funny, I looked into quantum computing and came away knowing pretty well how to use a future quantum computer. The math is pretty straightforward and useful. Now, getting an actual quantum computer with error correction that is scalable...
346.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
I'm not sure why you're okay with matrices but not the complex numbers. The complex numbers are a particular kind of matrix. Matrices and vector spaces (especially beyond the normal 3 dimensions) are even more mysterious. Complex
347.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
I think the claim is this: the wave function never collapses. However, the effect of the wave function on the environment quickly converges to only one of the two states. We could not know the difference because we cannot directly observe
348.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
I'm not sure that's true. Randomness has a well-defined meaning for me: unable to be computed by a finite program. The vast majority of real numbers are thus composed of truly random digits. Suppose the universe has a constant tha
349.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
We cannot continue like this where one religion gets to get mad whenever they do not achieve utter dominance.
350.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
I mean Pakistan is a nation founded on the idea that Muslims cannot live with non Muslims. /R/Pakistan is currently talking about this. What do you expect?
351.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
and millions of Orthodox Jews view Israel as defending Judaism. So what? Maybe all the people who are willing to shoot and kill for their holy book should be put into an area and bomb each other to death Would make a good reality tv show an
352.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
International law == who has biggest guns
353.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
Most Americans would. No fan of Trump but he is the duly elected president of the United States and has not done anything particularly egregious.
354.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
I would personally like some quantification of how good this is compared to just replacing the system prompt of an off the shelf 8B parameter language model. The suppression bit is very powerful. I would like to see a quantification of how
355.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
I mean you can. If you read the actual article: https://itep.org/meta-tax-breaks-trump-mark-zuckerberg/ You just have to buy of equipment used for a business purpose that you can depreciate. You then put these on Form
356.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
I have consistently held that solar will replace oil once solar becomes cheap. Literally you cannot beat the market. This is not revisionist. It's simply true. The same thing holds America back from barbarism. Our material wealth is wh
357.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
Weakly typed, but strongly kinded. It is a strict requirement that all theorem provers have a notion of type. This is by contradiction. Suppose you had a weakly typed theorem language L. Suppose you have a definition D of set in this weakly
358.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
That's because that type of code is actually better performing than the dynamic dispatch. There's absolutely nothing wrong with this code. It's just that it's not as extensible It's a 'closed world' repres
359.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
This is the standard type class approach. Haskell does the same thing.
360.
▲
by
anon291
8mo ago
Have you considered improving ygddrasil or something similar.
More ›