anon1385

14 ms·

91.
by anon1385 9y ago
Could you show us some examples of AMP sites served from Cloudflare (and not the Google AMP cache) that show up in the Google AMP carousel and get the AMP logo in the Google search results?
92.
Sexual torture: when police touch black men against their will(theguardian.com)
2 points by anon1385 9y ago|0 comments
93.
Police accuse Uber of failing to report sex attacks committed by drivers(telegraph.co.uk)
17 points by anon1385 9y ago|0 comments
94.
by anon1385 9y ago
As far as I can see it takes over 5 days at least 50% of the time: https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/queue-weekly-status-2017-08-... (E: and that's currently; go back a few months and it's nearly 90% taking ove
95.
by anon1385 9y ago
CDC methodology vs UK methodology doesn't explain why California has a rate of 7.3 maternal deaths per 100,000 compared with 22.0 for the US as a whole. Or why the rate in California is falling (like other developed countries) while th
96.
by anon1385 9y ago
When the US government kidnaps non US-citizens they don't give you the chance to call your lawyer. You get stripped, beaten, sodomised and sedated. If you're lucky you get released after a few months of torture. https:/&#x2F
97.
by anon1385 9y ago
>I've been reading the Guardian for a long time and I've noticed it's been embracing some of the more unsavory elements of the left in recent years. What elements? If you mean deliberately antagonistic opinion pieces from
98.
by anon1385 9y ago
It's relative. From my point of view as an outsider the US print media scene appears to be dominated by what I'd describe as broadsheets (NYT, Washington Post, WSJ, LA Times etc). These papers can at times be pretty bad and I don&
99.
by anon1385 9y ago
>The Guardian, which someone else mentioned, is massively left-leaning It really isn't. It's a liberal paper not a left wing one. That's not a theoretical distinction; you just need to look at their coverage of the UK Labo
100.
by anon1385 9y ago
>I doubt they were as influential in main political discussion as e.g. Fox News seems to be today. Why do you assume that? Absolute garbage tabloids have been influencing elections and dominating mainstream political discourse in western
101.
UK defence secretary threatens military strikes against hackers(bbc.com)
2 points by anon1385 9y ago|1 comments
102.
How to win an election in seven complex steps(marketingweek.com)
4 points by anon1385 9y ago|1 comments
103.
by anon1385 9y ago
Same here. It appears to check http://update.videolan.org/vlc/sparkle/vlc-intel64.xml for updates and the newest version listed there is 2.2.4
104.
Theresa May Wants to Regulate the Internet(buzzfeed.com)
5 points by anon1385 9y ago|0 comments
105.
Theresa May Wants To Regulate The Internet(buzzfeed.com)
241 points by anon1385 9y ago|179 comments
106.
by anon1385 9y ago
Nothing has changed though. You still get these kinds of ads pretty much every time you visit the site. It doesn't matter that the article is from 2013 when the problem it describes still exists. That it has existed this long, despite
107.
by anon1385 9y ago
It's still relevant. I took this screenshot a few seconds ago: https://i.imgur.com/6LoQ3TW.png
108.
by anon1385 9y ago
>The Official Secrets Act must be signed by you That's not true. It's a law not a contract; everybody is bound by it: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summ... >Do you have to sign
109.
by anon1385 9y ago
Your comments here are arguing that this isn't a problem. You called the stats dashboard "hugely misleading" with the implication that the problem is not as bad as it would suggest, but actually it shows that the problem is
110.
by anon1385 9y ago
Are you suggesting it's ok for non-western users to be tracked this way? Why would we ignore most of the world when discussing an issue like this?
111.
by anon1385 9y ago
Are you suggesting that Tavis Ormandy is making this up? This is upvoted because of the reputations of the people reporting it and because it sounds very serious. It's nothing to do with any kind of anti-Windows agenda.
112.
by anon1385 9y ago
The definitions are in the original act here: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2016/25/section/261/enac... It's very broad: A 'telecommunications operator' is somebody who "of
113.
by anon1385 9y ago
Sure, if you run a server that's only running some unmodified AGPLv3 software then you don't have to share the source, although in that situation the user typically has access to the source through other channels anyway (the marke
114.
by anon1385 9y ago
It's not FUD, it's an awkward reality. The FSF themselves don't deny that there's a contradiction. The right to use modify code privately is one of the four freedoms, so your insistence that the AGPLv3 violates it is jus
115.
by anon1385 9y ago
>The AGPL only requires that you offer the source code to the "Corresponding Source"[1] of the AGPL licensed program The entire definition of "corresponding source" in the AGPLv3 is identical to the language from the
116.
by anon1385 9y ago
That's incorrect. The AGPL is considered Free Software by the FSF even though it clearly limits use of the software. If you want to know why they support a license that violates freedom zero you will have to ask them but to me it sugge
117.
by anon1385 9y ago
Anything licensed under the AGPL attaches conditions to using the software. Running the software on a server means you are required to open source the other software running on the server.
118.
by anon1385 9y ago
Anything under the AGPL. For example just running AGPL software anywhere on Google's servers would open them up to having to open source the entire of Google search. That's why Google has banned the AGPL: https://openso
119.
by anon1385 9y ago
>The great thing about the free market is you get the choice. You don't have to pass a law to force everybody to also do as you choose. Not necessarily: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Market_for_Lemons
120.
by anon1385 9y ago
>Free markets still require laws addressing theft, property ownership, contract law, etc It's funny you say that, because one of the features of AirBnB is that it has "disrupted" property ownership and contract law. A huge

More ›