anon1007

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by anon1007 11y ago

   > though I'll say I do make more now, at a for-profit company That's what I meant by underpaid. It's well known that Mozilla pays below-market rate salaries. Instead it deceptively uses its supposed non-profit status (actu
2. 2.▲
   by anon1007 11y ago

   https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11230668 Notice also that this topic was quickly flagged off the front page, just like the linked one.
3. 3.▲
   by anon1007 11y ago

   Exactly! Why are Mitchell Baker and other execs at Mozilla being rewarded for lack-luster performance with nearly $1 million a year in compensation, meanwhile the actual programmers that toil on Mozilla's products go underpaid or even
4. 4.▲
   by anon1007 11y ago

   Relevant discussion on the issue of Mozilla's outlandish executive compensation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10101637 tl;dr: Mozilla is clearly failing as an organization, its programmers are underpaid, and it