annexrichmond

4 ms·

1.
by annexrichmond 2mo ago
The problem he was reacting to (local decisions dominated by people with locked-in benefits and low future exposure) is real. His idea there is silly but I think treating a couple of provocative X replies as some far right agenda is its own
2.
by annexrichmond 2mo ago
The link you shared is just a podcast and does not contain even contain “far right”. Can you provide specific concerns, otherwise I don’t see anything wrong with a CEO of the most successful tech company should not be concerned about a hor
3.
by annexrichmond 2mo ago
I’ve recently discovered Galbitang and despite being far less popular, I much prefer it over pho. We make it in a pressure cooker as well and love how easy it is!
4.
by annexrichmond 5mo ago
> the bet on camera-only driven system did not pay off This is a pretty unsubstantiated claim. Tesla is now launching robotaxis at a fraction of the cost of Waymos, in part because they don't need all the Lidar.
5.
by annexrichmond 5mo ago
Yet you conveniently forgot about this [1] > When asked if it would be OK to misgender the high-profile trans woman Caitlin Jenner if it was the only way to avoid nuclear apocalypse, it replied that this would "never" be accept
6.
The Most Impactful U.S. Inventions(wsj.com)
2 points by annexrichmond 5mo ago|0 comments
7.
by annexrichmond 5mo ago
Well, historically this has been more effective than any other system known to man.
8.
by annexrichmond 5mo ago
If it was working “fine” then why was Iran able to reach 60% enriched uranium and enough for 10 nuclear weapons if they were able to enrich further?
9.
by annexrichmond 5mo ago
So you think the US should sit back and watch Iran develop nukes? Is that the “moral” thing to do?
10.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
A quick search suggests 25k Canadians enter the US daily for multi-day trips. If ICE was any real concern here for Canadians we'd hear a lot more about it I think.
11.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
The cases you link relate to someone with previous convictions that could affect their legal status and someone potentially filing faulty documents and overstaying their legal status. They were not just visitors, so not sure why you are co
12.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
There's not much precedent to get a powerful, vulnerable country to willingly disarm their nukes. It's fair to say Israel shouldn't have them but I'd be far more uncomfortable with Iran All their leaders have repeatedly
13.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
OP basically said every country is the same, has the same motive, so therefore it's ok for them to have nukes if others have them. That couldn't be more naive, and the Nazi regime is a prime example.
14.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
Sure. Hitler was also a vegetarian. Is that really your best argument?
15.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
US doesn't have to engage for Iran to use nukes. But of course we should prevent that from becoming a realistic scenario?
16.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
> We supposedly destroyed their nuclear program last summer. And somehow their nuclear potential just became a war-worthy threat in February? What news are you even reading? You are terribly misinformed or out of touch. Not all of it wa
17.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
They were able to move and hide a lot of the enriched uranium ahead of those bombings. Not all of it was destroyed.
18.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
Nobody is saying they are acceptable. But it'd be naive to say there's ever zero risk. What's your brilliant plan? Let Iran have nukes?
19.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
This reminds me of this great talk from Temporal about how they built their Python SDK by creating a distributed deterministic event loop on top of asyncio[1] [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEbUzMYlAAI
20.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
I don’t get why they get so much praise for design with such a big design flaw: If a flight is delayed even 1 minute, it’s highlighted as red text. This throws me off every time. Google does not this. It still shows as green if it’s just a
21.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
Half the comments in this thread are not following the guidelines
22.
by annexrichmond 6mo ago
the headline literally says "could", not that it did. can you point to evidence that DOGE cutbacks did negatively affect aviation safety, particularly with regards to ATCs?
23.
by annexrichmond 7mo ago
Everyone is biased. If you don’t have a counterpoint then your comment not helpful.
24.
by annexrichmond 7mo ago
100%. In my area unfortunately my ISP shares the same infra as my mobile provider. Many times they’ve gone out together.
25.
by annexrichmond 7mo ago
Right, and Wikipedia leadership is free of any conflicts of interest: During and after her Wikimedia role, Maher drew fire for statements perceived as rejecting objective truth or Wikipedia’s traditional “free and open” model: • In a 2021
26.
by annexrichmond 7mo ago
Citation needed.
27.
by annexrichmond 7mo ago
Drivel. They’re selling just as well as Rivians.
28.
by annexrichmond 7mo ago
Are really suggesting everything in Wikipedia is truthful, complete, and free of all biases?
29.
Age of Empires: 25 years of pathfinding problems with C++ [video](youtube.com)
2 points by annexrichmond 8mo ago|0 comments
30.
by annexrichmond 8mo ago
How do you suppose Cybertruck is a failure? I see just as many of them as Rivians, while releasing over 5 years later.

More ›