anna-gabriella

5 ms·

1.
by anna-gabriella 2y ago
[flagged]
2.
by anna-gabriella 2y ago
[flagged]
3.
by anna-gabriella 2y ago
DeepMind made huge breakthroughs, agreed. AlphaGo beat a sitting go champion, which was very cool. AlphaFold solved a large number of proteins with verified results. Are we clear on this? Hope you are taking back your ad hominem. The team t
4.
by anna-gabriella 2y ago
We are discussing AlphaChip in 2024, not AlphaGo from 2016. I don't know much about protein folding (there were some controversies there, but that's not relevant). Neither of these has been related to product claims. As for "
5.
by anna-gabriella 2y ago
Reposting, as someone is flagging my comments. > People in the know are following this topic - big-wow surprise!
6.
by anna-gabriella 2y ago
Hm... I also had to piece things together and agree that Google PR is pretty slick. The approach had promise 3-4 years ago, but the science seems clear now. Google is avoiding tests on shared chip designs but claims a breakthrough. There is
7.
by anna-gabriella 2y ago
I can tell you get excited by SciFi, that's where Google's work belongs - people have been unable to reproduce it outside Google by a long shot.
8.
by anna-gabriella 2y ago
Does this make any sense, really? - Define some common words and then let the media run wild with them. How about we redefine "better" and "revolutionize"? Oh, wait, I think people are doing that already...
9.
by anna-gabriella 2y ago
Dated or not, if half of the criticisms are right, the original paper may need to be retracted. No progress on RL for chip design was published by Google since 2022, as far as I can tell. So, it looks like most if not all criticisms remain
10.
by anna-gabriella 2y ago
That does not mean you need to pre-train either. Common sense, no?