anjc

54 ms·

391.
by anjc 9y ago
> People do argue that women should not be in tech At least pretend that you don't have a completely blinkered view of the world.
392.
by anjc 9y ago
I love the comments here. This is typical business bullshit....where's the control group....nm the significant amount of data and analysis, it's actually all about luck...typical HBR... Do you dimwits understand the general conc
393.
by anjc 9y ago
That makes total sense but it sounds as if his realisation tended towards open licenses being preferable in all academic scenarios, due to a now-more firmly held belief that lawyers etc are a waste of time. This obviously isn't a rule
394.
by anjc 9y ago
Follow up to my other comment...I just noticed from your bio that you work at Intel, and now have to lol at you complaining about academics trying to license commercial products. I presume you don't mind when tax-funds are directed tow
395.
by anjc 9y ago
I Was Wrong (Part 3)
396.
by anjc 9y ago
What are these not-very-interested academics expecting? For you to agree to whatever commercial license or...? I don't get why you'd expect academic institutions to offer you permissive licenses though, when in all likelihood you
397.
by anjc 9y ago
I don't understand why you think you were wrong, based on the article. Surely it depends upon your objectives. If your goal is for researchers to use the software then one license might be preferable, if your goal is commercialisation
398.
by anjc 9y ago
I don't think the skills translate from a kitchen in the manner described. No doubt being in a kitchen environment is demanding, requires rigorous prep, can be high pressured, is high energy etc. These are attributes of the environment
399.
by anjc 9y ago
I did, I don't get it though. I think it's dishonest to read something and decide yourself that it's not worth mentioning, even if your work relates to it in some manner. To take an example, read the article linked to in the
400.
by anjc 9y ago
I don't get the distinction. Nobody expects you to cite something which you didn't read, or which didn't influence your work. The question here is whether you should cite something which you did read, and does relate to your
401.
by anjc 9y ago
But this implies that you could re-implement/modify/publish something from a paper and just not cite it because you deem it to be nonsense. That's surely dishonest. If you've read something which closely relates to your
402.
by anjc 9y ago
> The second quote is about stuff that didn't influence your work. While you are expected to keep up with and document related developments, forcing authors to constantly update references to new, not yet properly evaluated work jus
403.
by anjc 9y ago
Confused by this part: > Yes, of course. Any time that our work follows, copies, or borrows ideas from other people, and when we can reasonably be expected to be aware of this, we ought to cite the related work. > We should not have t
404.
by anjc 9y ago
I'm sure it's a great car in person, but from a casual observer's perspective, the dash looks like they upcycled the trim from a 70s car/station wagon/boat by sticking a shitty Android tablet onto it. It reminds m
405.
by anjc 9y ago
Constantly on my Surface, which remains rock steady due to the stand.
406.
by anjc 9y ago
Ok Watson
407.
by anjc 9y ago
Bro there's an option to use up to 6 monitors buried in the preferences, FS4 was used for some production simulators at the time, don't forget. No I'm only joking, well done.
408.
by anjc 9y ago
I didn't watch the full discussion but I think it's fair to say that "let her speak please" was not the most important thing said that day. How big headed is this person that she thinks her input was more important than
409.
by anjc 9y ago
That's one possibility , yeah
410.
by anjc 9y ago
What exaggeration! > "Oh my god. what you said was the most important thing that was said all day. Thank you. Thank you." > most important thing that was said > most important
411.
by anjc 9y ago
....the default app Reader? It couldn't be any more touch and pen friendly.
412.
by anjc 9y ago
I know people who are very engaging and entertaining when speaking, but who are frankly not creative or clever enough to have anything ground-breaking to say. On the flip side there are people who are terrible speakers who do have ground-br
413.
by anjc 9y ago
Just saw this now, thanks, very informative.
414.
by anjc 9y ago
Sounds like you're conflating the value of the coins with the corporate value being invested. Corporations are dedicating a desk or a lab or a few staff to Crypto. There may be a decrease in the value of coins but there's no bubbl
415.
by anjc 9y ago
True but it should be possible to compare interview performance to job. I presume that interview performances for successful hires aren't uniform, and that on-the-job performances aren't uniform either. If these interview practice
416.
by anjc 9y ago
Has any link ever been determined between interview performance and on-the-job performance? I've made the clichéd mistake mentioned in the article of wearing a suit to an interview where it wasn't appropriate, and felt the air bei
417.
by anjc 9y ago
Yeah very possible
418.
by anjc 9y ago
Oh yeah totally. Or iPads and iPhones for that matter, imo.
419.
by anjc 9y ago
Cannibalisation refers to competition within your own product-line causing a reduction in revenue. E.g. with simple figures: Apple spend 1 billion producing iPads from start to finish, and selling them produces 10b in income. They then intr
420.
by anjc 9y ago
> bits of programming, and some more advanced document preparation If you can't do them on an iPad then you simply can not consider it a "work machine", in the general sense. You can do those on a 15 year old laptop with e

More ›