Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ang_cire
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
751.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
No, I think they weren't bound by a time limit in a competitive activity. If they had been, and not spread, I'd think they were terrible at debating, yes. Do you think competitive debate are unable to speak slowly when there'
752.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
So in policy there aren't 'points', it's just a ballot decision, and I haven't seen speaker points deducted for dropping arguments that didn't factor into the ballot. The danger in dropping an argument is that
753.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
If you don't think you learn that from competitive debate, you don't know many debaters. One of the biggest skills it teaches is argument-analysis, and you'd better believe that sticks around outside the debate round.
754.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
> Do you agree that 'adult-adult-hetersexual' is the only orientation that has obvious evolutionary benefit? This shows a profound misunderstanding of evolution and natural selection on your part. "Evolutionary benefit&quo
755.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
> The entire weekend was "make this change, type make $SOMETHING, then wait for 50m, then watch it fail to boot, then examine how far the bootloader got, then boot with previous image, then undo that change and repeat the process&qu
756.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
> Version 1.0 of Slackware was announced on the July 16, 1993 "Very good year. Nearly as old as I am!"
757.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
I don't think we should pay, I think Google should. They're the ones making profit.
758.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
> The action in this case is very well-defined - it is the sending of a thumbs up emoji. The question is what was intended by it. Which makes it not clearly-defined as intending to enter a contract. The action of sending an emoji, unlike
759.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
Lmao, what a crock.
760.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
You are talking about ambiguous wording in contact language, which is very different than it being ambiguous whether someone was entering into a contract or not. The latter is not a thing; both parties have to reasonably understand they a
761.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
But the meaning is ambiguous. If the farmer had typed, "got it", that could either be an acknowledgement of receipt or an expression of understanding, and the thumbs-up is used the same way. Contract agreements need to be explicit
762.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
If too many people opt out, they just set up a new company and boom! No one has requested they get rid of the data or not collect it. Opt-in is the only way to make this work, and that's why it will never get passed.
763.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
What do people expect? ACAB.
764.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
No one working in tech told anyone to learn to code. That whole thing came up during debates about the Green New Deal displacing fossil fuel jobs, and people actually said we needed programs to realign those workers into green energy jobs.
765.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
Damn, slitaz... That's a blast from the past. Right next to bb4win and openshell in my childhood OS explorations.
766.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
Maybe this is anecdotal, but all the people I've seen who love working at the office are either single, or have something at home they don't want to be around (whether that's partner, kids, neighbor, parents, etc). All the pe
767.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
s/"falling into the hands"/"being sold to"/
768.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
Not sure if I replied to you further up, or someone else, but in any scientific study you should be attempting to minimize the impact of the observation method used on the outcome of the data, and when it comes to answering questions truthf
769.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
You'd need the participants not to know they are part of a study. They'd need to be in a situation where they believe that the statement of their true beliefs is critical. This isn't impossible (many studies do use primary so
770.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
Gladiatorial combat was used to help preserve the social order. Public executions were often just that but skipping the combat part, and people would often cheer them on like a football game. You'd be surprised how little people care a
771.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
So you think that if e.g. Stack exchange is storing code examples in their database, they shouldn't transform the special characters into e.g. url-encoding or some other escaped format? How are you going to validate it doesn't do
772.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
You absolutely may need and want to transform data. You don't want to store code unmodified in a database; that's how you end up with SSTI or stored XSS. You encode special characters in a simple, reversible way (as one example).
773.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
Yeah, this post is just a ruse to drum up DAU numbers for Reddit by making users unwittingly cross the picket line! /s ;)
774.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
And in the manifesto the author says > I’m not smart enough to figure out how to transform data between different layers of the system, so I just don’t. I use the same represetnation in the UI layer and the storage layer. That has nothin
775.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
Well first off, that's not correct anyways; type-conformancy is a very valid and important part of data sanitization. E.g. does the SSN consist of 3 valid integers split on dashes? If not, it ain't a proper SSN. Catching that type
776.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
Sure, but this article is not a general discussion of the merits or demerits of direct sales, it's about a law being passed by a political frontrunner, for political reasons.
777.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
A dead man's switch requires inaction, not action. The whole point is that if you don't do something, the action occurs.
778.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
I think the 'no pure politics discussion' rule is kind of out the window when the article is literally just about politics, from a site with "politics" in the literal name and url. :P
779.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
Hand in hand. Regulatory capture is one aspect of crony capitalism, but subsidies for your buddies, bailouts, and nepotism are all parts as well (and plenty more).
780.
▲
by
ang_cire
3y ago
Because of things like mass assignment or IDOR, or injection attacks, presumably. Handing data from the user (untrusted input) directly to the backend unchanged is going to in 99.9999999% of cases also mean it's unchecked. "I'
More ›