androceium

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by androceium 5y ago

   I was seeing it on Android w/ Firefox. Seems like it's fixed now though. :)
2. 2.▲
   by androceium 5y ago

   Pretty neat!!! You may already be aware of this, but the page doesn't seem to be formatted correctly on mobile. The content shows in a single thin column in the middle.
3. 3.▲
   by androceium 5y ago

   You could do this with the :has() CSS psuedo-class[0], though inverted (select a parent that _has_ the child matching a selector). Looks like that psuedo-class has not been implemented in the kuchiki library that htmlq uses though. [0]: ht
4. 4.▲
   by androceium 5y ago

   Their content monetization policy[0] doesn't seem to prohibit sexual content. I wonder if this was made in response to the previous OnlyFans announcement(s)? [0]: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies&#x2F
5. 5.▲
   by androceium 5y ago

   What's the difference between that and the current situation (forced to used Apple's payment system)? Isn't Apple just forcing everyone to use what suits them best?