Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
andriosr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
Lessons Learned from Benchmarking DevOps Teams of 200 Fintechs
(andrios.co)
2 points
by
andriosr
4y ago
|
0 comments
32.
▲
Authorization (RBAC) is the forgotten child of security
(docs.runops.io)
11 points
by
andriosr
4y ago
|
0 comments
33.
▲
by
andriosr
4y ago
Super cool! I've been planning integrating https://runops.io/ to VSCode for a while and most of the delay is related to having to write Javascript. I like your wrapping of the VSCode js API. I'll use as inspiratio
34.
▲
Runops (YC W21) is hiring a dev advocate to help fix security tech
(ycombinator.com)
1 points
by
andriosr
4y ago
35.
▲
by
andriosr
5y ago
So cool!! Will try it
36.
▲
by
andriosr
5y ago
I have no idea on how this works, even after watching the video and reading the whole landing page. What is the difference from a regular linter? What sorts of problems would it catch?
37.
▲
by
andriosr
5y ago
Not sure how this is Better than loom. I like the privacy part, but is that it?
38.
▲
AWS ECS vs. Kubernetes kubectl exec commands
(runops.io)
1 points
by
andriosr
5y ago
|
0 comments
39.
▲
Runops (YC W21) Is Hiring a Developer That Enjoys Content Creation
1 points
by
andriosr
5y ago
40.
▲
by
andriosr
5y ago
I think it can’t get easier than https://runops.io No VPN, DNS, IPs, and so on; and get to the same result: any device accessing resources in private networks, besides a few extra features.
41.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
Yes, Rundeck is nice, but has its downsides. We have a lot of companies migrating from it. Runops is the perfect alternative :)
42.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
This is great, thanks for sharing! We handle most of these in Runops itself, but you can also use your existing CM tool and leverage only the UX and automations from Runops. We have APIs and webhooks that enables you to extend Runops, one c
43.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
This is an interesting way to put it. Yes, you could say it's an API Gateway for Cloud tools. I like it!
44.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
I agree with many of these points, here are some thoughts on how we deal them: > Most enterprises are wary of handing over control to a vendor Great point, we do have the Enterprise version, which is self-hosted. > Do you find a lot o
45.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
Teleport is a fantastic tool. The main difference are: 1) Runops doesn't require you to have tools (kubectl, psql, etc) installed locally and don't download temporary credentials to access resources, commands execute in the Cloud.
46.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
Glad to hear we could help in the future, feel free to reach out any time. We would love to hear more about your use cases and the alternatives you guys have in mind to improve the PCI assessment results. We support Azure :)
47.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
It was a combination of multiple things. The first customer came from the newsletter I run called SRE Teams ( https://sreteams.substack.com ). Others came from intros from my network and from reaching out to people I thought we co
48.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
Yes, I like your definition. We don't have certifications yet, but the team has done the biggest ones before we are keeping everything ready to get them. We should start the processes in the next couple of months. That being said, not
49.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
Yes, we have a lot of work to do on our landing page to better explain these points. It's early days, but we will get there! Here is some light on them: It's cloud hosted, and we do support self-hosting for enterprises. The code
50.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
Curiously I started in the dev team and migrated to infra in an attempt to fix things :)
51.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
I've done that and can relate to the problem! It's common for Kubernetes, where you never know which cluster kubectl is pointing to. The Target (what we can where you are running things), is one of the options in the CLI. So you h
52.
▲
Launch HN: Runops (YC W21) – A better cloud shell for production apps
97 points
by
andriosr
6y ago
|
23 comments
53.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
I'm glad AWS is working on this. It's a big problem and companies are not facing it. Wrote about it here: https://andrios.co/articles/oneoffs But CloudShell is yet too narrow of a solution, I'm sure they
54.
▲
One-off scripts: DevOps last mile
(andrios.co)
8 points
by
andriosr
6y ago
|
1 comments
55.
▲
Lisp in One Tweet
(twitter.com)
1 points
by
andriosr
6y ago
|
0 comments
56.
▲
Ask HN: What made your company move to Kubernetes?
2 points
by
andriosr
6y ago
|
0 comments
57.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
yep, but their API is this thing mentioned all over the place, a big market diff, and I didn't see a company get even close to it. Like GCP can catch AWS in features and overall experience, Samsung get close to Apple phones, Facebook c
58.
▲
Ask HN: Why was no company able to replicate the Stripe API?
2 points
by
andriosr
6y ago
|
3 comments
59.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
That is really interesting. What are the top 3 differences you saw between the two worlds?
60.
▲
by
andriosr
6y ago
Cool, I did some projects with large banks, saw something similar. The problem is that the bureaucracy solves some of the reliability at the cost of speed. That is the biggest problem with most large banks IMO
More ›