Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
andr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
56 ms
·
541.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
While the direction this is taking is ingenious, the concrete implementation is useless. There's a reason why genetic algorithms are automated - most of the mutations are useless, so it's a waste of person's time to look at all of them. Wha
542.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Project Euler + Django
543.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Clearly better than Emacs! (j/k)
544.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
What's the purpose of that book? It's published in 2002, so computers had been able to generate random numbers for decades. It's worthless as an OTP book, as it's probably the only such book.
545.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Technical summary, please?
546.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Citation needed.
547.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Google has the know how (XMPP), the significant user base (every Gmail user), and the relationship (who talks to who) information to do this themselves. Heck, they just need to start logging GTalk status messages.
548.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
I'm afraid more and more of Seth's posts are turning into blah-blahs. In the past he had lots of very insightful posts, but now it's usually commonsense advice written using too many words.
549.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
It is, but only YouTube would have realistically bought Omnisio, so they essentially locked themselves in a single-client market. Same goes for Xobni.
550.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Oh well, time to brush off the old "sell dog food online" business plan.
551.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Define sucking. Sun is the only midlevel server company that innovates beyond buying mother boards and CPUs and assembling them. They make their own CPUs, their own OS, ZFS, serious storage solutions, etc. They foot the bill for MySQL and J
552.
▲
Sun announcing up to 6000 (18%) layoffs
(bloomberg.com)
38 points
by
andr
18y ago
|
31 comments
553.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Deserves a place in the inventors hall of fame, right next to the ropeless jump rope: http://jumpsnap.com/
554.
▲
Ask YC: Good agile book?
4 points
by
andr
18y ago
|
3 comments
555.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
I'd try to build a microsharding system. Depending on the amount of data you want to store, go for 256 or 65k virtual shards and allocate a few shards on each DB server. A hash of the key will give you its shard and it's easy to keep a shar
556.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Reminds me of BroadVision's 3-page long URLs of dot com boom fashion.
557.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Ah, the one game that should've had a sequel but did not. I would've traded Monkey Island 4 for GF2 gladly. PS The tears of joy box on the very last page was a great touch.
558.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Ok, so the whole article is just a regurgitation of what is already known about Windows Azure + ranting. Dziuba has obviously not used the service. If you think about it, .NET Live Services' service bus = SQS but better. SQL Services = Bigt
559.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
I know people complain when new Windows releases take 5 years, but is the opposite better. I mean I just got my official 8.04.1 CD last month.
560.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
There go my funding plans...
561.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Definitely not the way to hit on chicks that are Beatles fans.
562.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Definitely interesting! From what I see at first glance, there's a queue/MQ-like service, a scalable database (is it SQL or key/value?), a workflow service, and the whole thing works whether you want to use .NET or not.
563.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Give me your email and I'll send you the answer.
564.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Why is this dead? It's a pretty clever ad as far as advertising goes.
565.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
While it's possible to have a very cool and challenging PHP project, most of the work you get paid for is glorified HTML forms. What I do to fight the boredom is build my own framework. Over 2-3 projects I've gotten to something that is clo
566.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
Fix it, fix it, fix it! (apologies to SNL)
567.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
They shut down Muxtape.
568.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
OK, Microsoft clearly foreshadowed this: http://i36.tinypic.com/2llnhxk.jpg
569.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
They actually succeeded in hedging, because they halved their losses compared to the market. Hedging doesn't mean you always make money. It means that if your main instrument falls, instrument B is going to go up and cover some of the losse
570.
▲
by
andr
18y ago
That is why better hedge funds know when to be long and when to be short. My explanation makes a lot of assumptions for simplification, because it is impossible to know what every hedge fund is doing at every point in time.
More ›