andersonpico

5 ms·

31.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
What do you mean designs like this? This is 2016-cyberpunk-neon-era inspired by video game interfaces, these are not uncommon at all. Google something like "discord cyberpunk theme" or "cyberpunk rice site:reddit.com/r&#
32.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
there's literally a comment sibling to the one you're responding to saying he wants to PAY FOR ADS. It's really hard to tell satire apart from I WANT TO PAY FOR ADS around these parts.
33.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
> complaints should be be about what is happening Why would you think that? An ad supported product has misaligned incentives, everyone can see that and that's why the confidence erodes from that moment on. You're living in the
34.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
You can't fight this battle in the current judicial system. If before anyone can successfully bring a lawsuit in front of a judge the company has unlimited money, then at least one of these three things will be true: a. the damages won
35.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
Keep fighting the good fight. Also, offering a counterpoint for the sibling comments: Yandex results are the most valuable for the type of thing censored in all other search engines. If I want to search for news on the war on Ukraine I go a
36.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
Every company that I've worked with that provided models internally did so through LiteLLM and offered both Anthropic and OpenAI models so it was trivial to switch between them.
37.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
I mean, you could. I've read your blog and it's quite well-written, not only just better-than-know-your-meme. Thank you btw, some really nice reads there.
38.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
I appreciate the detailed response. It's a very important topic that is often filled with empty platitudes and not enough detail.
39.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
this is incredible graph work (despite the bleak subject)
40.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
> The Gramsican march through the institutions is complete what in the ever living conspiracy theory hot pot is that > 300 million fully armed and trained Americans not even close > I won the lottery of life, born in the latter hal
41.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
That makes sense as well, I think it's a nice human perspective. People really are uniquely tired lately.
42.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
> the OpenAI comms guy who responded already scrubbed his X account who responded to what?
43.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
But distribution isn't the only crime here, obtaining the material illegally apparently is a crime too. And the damn robot can also spit me harry Potter verbatim so I don't know how it would also not be distribution?
44.
by andersonpico 3mo ago
Not disagreeing, but I wonder how much you have to fuck up to put a trillion dollar company in trouble. Surely it can't be that bad, right?
45.
by andersonpico 4mo ago
after reading yours and themaninthedark comments I understand what you're getting at
46.
by andersonpico 4mo ago
The difference is you'll get caught a luddite and hear you're opposing progress if you try to get in the way of AI doing any and everything.
47.
by andersonpico 4mo ago
Announcers get very touchy with listings data, so even compiling listings from multiple sources is hard without getting cease-and-desisted. Then, realtors will certainly flood competing announcements and post fake reviews. It's an aggr
48.
by andersonpico 4mo ago
Why would that be more useful than fighting this fraud? Surely the original images would be more realistic than one passed through AI two times.
49.
by andersonpico 4mo ago
> but I don't see any evidence Isn't this screenshot on the article evidence https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45... ? Or could it still be the "I can't believe
50.
by andersonpico 4mo ago
I think that's a pretty well balanced first analysis of this, considering how much we don't know, the IPO "slots" seem to be the most obvious influence.
51.
by andersonpico 4mo ago
you mention wedding ring like it's a bad thing
52.
by andersonpico 4mo ago
Nah man that's not it
53.
by andersonpico 5mo ago
We liked to pretend that our current technology wave wasn't driven by any ideology at all, so much so that it became a dirty word. But look at these billionaires talking amongst themselves, look at Thiel, look at Musk: their ideology i
54.
by andersonpico 5mo ago
I've yet to meet anyone outside that likes AI except for manager or when people are pretending for their bosses at work. It became a survival tactic.
55.
by andersonpico 5mo ago
what do django do that's contrived in js or say aspnet or rails?
56.
by andersonpico 5mo ago
that's a really useful way to frame the discussion around tooling
57.
by andersonpico 5mo ago
> No diabetic with baseline adult competence is going to drive their insulin-delivery vehicle off a cliff because some app said so. if you can't trust this thing then what is it doing? the implication that people that trust this sof
58.
by andersonpico 5mo ago
Programmers are the easiest target: they're the group most averse to organizing; their bosses, however, are not.
59.
by andersonpico 6mo ago
HN is the most concentrated accelerationist audience in the whole world and its very particular type of crowd. I don't think this translates at all to general public (well, maybe I would agree with you that the aesthetic sense of peopl
60.
by andersonpico 6mo ago
you're arguing against things that have no material effect. "oh won't you think about adversarial discourse about the most well funded industry in recent history"

More ›