3 ms·

> but I don't see any evidence Isn't this screenshot on the article evidence https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45754453717/content/imag

> but I don't see any evidence Isn't this screenshot on the article evidence https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45754453717/content/images/size/w1600/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-27-at-21.19.04.png https://storage.ghost.io/c/39/f8/39f85cc7-8637-40fc-a57c-f45... ? Or could it still be the "I can't believe it's not DMCA" you've mentioned?

bluGill 4mo ago
I don't know how to tell the difference. Google has incentive to hide this
- pavlov 4mo ago
  It reads multiple times “DMCA” on that page but you’re saying it could be some unspecified other type of complaint. If that’s really the case, isn’t Google a fraudulent party here by sending people DMCA notices that aren’t? The DMCA perjury penalty would seem to apply here as well (lying about receiving a third party notice).
  - bluGill 4mo ago
    Maybe. I said elsewhere "see a lawyer, be prepared to pay them millions to recover thousands".
- andersonpico 4mo ago
  after reading yours and themaninthedark comments I understand what you're getting at
themaninthedark 4mo ago
That may be DMCA notice but I think that BluGill get to the heart of the matter in saying the Google doesn't follow the DMCA process. They have their own process that is a warped mirror of the DMCA process and they use the DMCA process as a fig leaf to hide their policies are different. Google was notorious for not acting on counter-claims: "For anyone out there who have been DMCA'd from Google and a properly filled out counter DMCA to them was rejected with the following: "Thanks for reaching out to us. At this time, Google has decided not to take action." Please contact me immediately " https://x.com/gelbooru/status/1168036119893688320 https://x.com/gelbooru/status/1168036119893688320 Here is a January 2026 view for the pro-easy take down side showing that Google is now requiring identities to issue DMCA claims: >"Fast‑forward to January 2026, and the same system now questions the very identity of the complainant, demanding proof that was never required before. " https://ubos.tech/news/googles-dmca-process-leaves-creators-frustrated-a-new-look/ https://ubos.tech/news/googles-dmca-process-leaves-creators-...

bluGill 4mo ago

I don't know how to tell the difference. Google has incentive to hide this

pavlov 4mo ago
It reads multiple times “DMCA” on that page but you’re saying it could be some unspecified other type of complaint. If that’s really the case, isn’t Google a fraudulent party here by sending people DMCA notices that aren’t? The DMCA perjury penalty would seem to apply here as well (lying about receiving a third party notice).
- bluGill 4mo ago
  Maybe. I said elsewhere "see a lawyer, be prepared to pay them millions to recover thousands".
andersonpico 4mo ago
after reading yours and themaninthedark comments I understand what you're getting at

themaninthedark 4mo ago

That may be DMCA notice but I think that BluGill get to the heart of the matter in saying the Google doesn't follow the DMCA process. They have their own process that is a warped mirror of the DMCA process and they use the DMCA process as a fig leaf to hide their policies are different. Google was notorious for not acting on counter-claims: "For anyone out there who have been DMCA'd from Google and a properly filled out counter DMCA to them was rejected with the following: "Thanks for reaching out to us. At this time, Google has decided not to take action." Please contact me immediately " https://x.com/gelbooru/status/1168036119893688320 https://x.com/gelbooru/status/1168036119893688320 Here is a January 2026 view for the pro-easy take down side showing that Google is now requiring identities to issue DMCA claims: >"Fast‑forward to January 2026, and the same system now questions the very identity of the complainant, demanding proof that was never required before. " https://ubos.tech/news/googles-dmca-process-leaves-creators-frustrated-a-new-look/ https://ubos.tech/news/googles-dmca-process-leaves-creators-...