andersa

12 ms·

151.
by andersa 2y ago
These are not redundant PSUs, each PSU powers different GPUs in the same machine. Are you sure connecting them to different phases is a good idea? I've been looking for a proper answer to this for a while, because I want to build a sim
152.
by andersa 2y ago
It's 32GB/s in both directions. So when exchanging data two GPUs each can do this at 64GB/s. Is that a useful way to measure it? Who knows.
153.
by andersa 2y ago
You can't fine tune a 70B model with this. It barely even fits the weights before it runs out of vram. Need a bigger machine.
154.
by andersa 2y ago
There is nothing the companies can do about it.
155.
by andersa 2y ago
It isn't possible for an American company to actually comply.
156.
by andersa 2y ago
It's not really possible to get rid of them in C++ however, given a staggering amount of legacy APIs that require them. Constantly converting every time you have to call a system API with your string is even worse.
157.
by andersa 2y ago
> it's the developer that gets charged, not the user. .......you do understand there is no difference, right? Any extra costs incurred by the developer will be passed on to the user.
158.
by andersa 2y ago
Cloudflare doesn't offer rate limiting by user. Caching is completely useless as a replacement for rate limiting. Simply add a bunch of nonsense to the url, or change query parameters, and you will bypass the cache.
159.
by andersa 2y ago
Is there a summary somewhere? 41 pages of dense text is quite a lot.
160.
by andersa 2y ago
Yep, the time where we don't need AC in Europe is long over. But the laws haven't caught up with this development yet (i.e. no mandatory AC in apartment buildings yet, or worse, some landlords actually seem to think they can forbi
161.
by andersa 2y ago
That would be amazing. Fuck the hot summers we currently get. My AC is wasting so much money...
162.
by andersa 2y ago
Perhaps it should not? Why would such a silly feature be explained over and over rather than removed ?
163.
by andersa 2y ago
What if we could escape the sandbox? Our software has crappy exploits all the time, why wouldn't theirs?
164.
by andersa 2y ago
As far as I can tell, they never run the garbage collector. Code I pushed to a fork that was deleted several years ago can still be accessed through the original parent repo.
165.
by andersa 2y ago
I wasn't really expecting a bounty, more so hoping they'd fix the issue. For example, to this day I keep having to tell people to never fork the Unreal Engine repository, instead making a manual copy, just in case. This causes lot
166.
by andersa 2y ago
I didn't find anything mentioning it online at the time. But there wasn't much time and dedication involved either, to be fair. I discovered it completely on accident when I combined a commit hash from my local client with the wro
167.
by andersa 2y ago
Based on some (admittedly not very thorough) search, this documentation was posted in 2021, three years after my report.
168.
by andersa 2y ago
No, that would be the "copy the repository" approach. Private fork is when you do it through their UI. As far as I know, it is not accessible.
169.
by andersa 2y ago
I reported this on their HackerOne many years ago (2018 it seems) and they said it was working as intended. Conclusion: don't use private forks. Copy the repository instead. Here is their full response from back then: > Thanks for t
170.
by andersa 2y ago
It's not sarcasm. The maintainers have completely lost the plot.
171.
by andersa 2y ago
Of course not. We must involve 10 layers of templates that mere mortals cannot read and compilers cannot process in reasonable time so the academics at the committee will be happy. Addressing real problems with simple solutions isn't a
172.
by andersa 2y ago
New outlook is no longer useful for accounts that aren't already from Microsoft, and who knows how long we get to keep using the old one. Thunderbird says it's no longer maintained by Mozilla. Do we have anything better yet?
173.
by andersa 2y ago
> sent me screenshots of my desktop Damn. That's the scariest thing I've read all week. This thread is really making me consider buying another computer for all gaming related things...
174.
by andersa 2y ago
The comparison is a good idea, but your conclusion from it goes in the wrong direction. What should have happened, is that Apple got slapped much harder.
175.
by andersa 2y ago
It actually seems to look pretty terrible.
176.
by andersa 2y ago
Of course not. There is no alternative. No, it doesn't count as an alternative if it's not in the same price range. This specifically applies to R2. Will keep using it until I can't anymore.
177.
by andersa 2y ago
The difference here is that you don't have to use Steam. For example, Epic Games is doing just fine providing downloads for Fortnite themselves.
178.
by andersa 2y ago
Apple has invested more work into malicious non-compliance than it would have taken to simply do it right the first time.
179.
by andersa 2y ago
Of course, we have an energy crisis and too much bureaucracy. Who in their right mind would want to run a company here?
180.
by andersa 2y ago
Doesn't make sense to require anything offline in the modern world. I'd argue the vast majority of group chats consists of people who have never met, likely live on entirely different continents, and yet have something in common (

More ›