6 ms·
Is there a summary somewhere? 41 pages of dense text is quite a lot.
by andersa 2y ago
Is there a summary somewhere? 41 pages of dense text is quite a lot.
- codetrotter 2y ago[flagged]
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> LLMs are pretty good at summarizing things They’re really not. They seem like it. We have a collective GPT-Mann amnesia where we read something summarised that we understand, recognise it for the bullshit that it is, and then promptly trust the next prompt when it summarises something outside our expertise. LLMs seem to do better when summarising summaries, e.g. of classical works. Someone else has whittled down the meaning. The LLM puts it into simpler terms.
- ccvannorman 2y ago[flagged]
- Sirizarry 2y agoNow what does it have to say as a rebuttal to that criticism?
- JumpCrisscross 2y agoGPT summaries read like the kid who skims the chapter titles and tells you what the book is about rather than what it says. Like, any cybercrime legislation risks “enabling mass surveillance, violating privacy rights, and creating avenues for state overreach without sufficient safeguards.” There is no actual content in that sentence, just containers. Any policy proposal that has the word “extradition” must contend with how it “may facilitate politically motivated prosecutions.” > broad criminalization of cyber offenses, such as electronic forgery, could lead to the overreach of law enforcement This is literally any law!
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> Is there a summary somewhere? We need analysis, not summary of the statute. What it compels whom to do, and how different principles were balanced in its drafting.
- walterbell 2y agoTalking points: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41222487 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41222487 Critique by 20 NGOs: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/01/joint-statement-proposed-cybercrime-treaty-ahead-concluding-session https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/01/joint-statement-propos... Further analysis needed.