ancillary

4 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by ancillary 1y ago

   "whole point of being alive" is maybe exaggerating for something that most people are demonstrably uninterested in paying more than a very small fraction of their income to consume?
2. 32.▲
   by ancillary 1y ago

   The supply of knowledgeable and conscientious reviewers in, say, machine learning, is far outmatched by the number of papers less knowledgeable and conscientious people submit.
3. 33.▲
   by ancillary 1y ago

   It seems less like shade than precision about who's saying it's advanced.
4. 34.▲
   by ancillary 1y ago

   Yeah, the world in which human-generated indie content is noticeably better (in terms of clicks) than blogspam or AI content seems better for Google. Each of those indie players is happy for some traffic, and they're unlikely to musc
5. 35.▲
   by ancillary 1y ago

   > The truth is: To understand a paper properly, you need to deal with it properly, not just the 5 minutes it takes to skim the first pages and make up your opinion there already. Fifteen pages is short enough, and if you cannot commit to
6. 36.▲
   by ancillary 1y ago

   I think I loved everything about The Tree of Life except for the scenes with Sean Penn. Whatever mysterious antipathy the girl behind you in the cinema felt for the movie, I felt for Sean Penn. The kind and probably accurate interpretatio