anandbaburajan

8 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by anandbaburajan 2y ago

   Thanks for your reply! I personally don't want to use it on phones, but for times when one only has a phone, we'll add mobile support soon.
2. 32.▲
   by anandbaburajan 2y ago

   Nope, didn't know about it. Looks interesting.
3. 33.▲
   by anandbaburajan 2y ago

   I agree. We have access to five complex discussions, and unfortunately, the ones with simple topics are not available to public.
4. 34.▲
   by anandbaburajan 2y ago

   Haha, CQ2 doesn't mean anything, and no, it has nothing to do with ICQ.
5. 35.▲
   by anandbaburajan 2y ago

   The blog post and homepage both are working fine for me on Firefox Android. Can you raise an issue on our GitHub? :D
6. 36.▲
   by anandbaburajan 2y ago

   Can you share what exactly you mean by a sideways change and a forward change, in this context? Thanks!
7. 37.▲
   by anandbaburajan 2y ago

   I like Kialo too! But it's more like a tool for simple discussions on simple/complex topics, not a tool for complex discussions.
8. 38.▲
   by anandbaburajan 2y ago

   Interesting, will explore more.
9. 39.▲
   by anandbaburajan 2y ago

   We'll be adding mobile support soon.
10. 40.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    I like Roam Research too! However, it's not a tool for complex discussions.
11. 41.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Thanks for sharing the laws!
12. 42.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    You meant going back to the first thread? If yes, you can just horizontally scroll (using trackpad or scroll wheel + shift). If not, go back where?
13. 43.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Thanks so much! Loved reading this. Both of the problems are very interesting and it would be fun to go deeper into them. Would love to stay in touch with you. Can you send a hi at anandbaburajan@gmail.com?
14. 44.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Wow, beautiful point! Very LessWrong-esque. Will definitely explore more.
15. 45.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Not really.
16. 46.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Yep.
17. 47.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    And neither Slack nor Zulip are suitable for complex discussions.
18. 48.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Interesting, can you send a link to a pic? I haven't used it and can't seem to find the visualization on Google.
19. 49.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Keyboard shortcuts coming soon! :D Also, curious to know where exactly you wanted to use arrow keys: moving horizontally between threads?
20. 50.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Wow, thanks for that detailed answer!
21. 51.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    TLDR seems like a good idea, will explore more, thanks.
22. 52.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    I didn't get you. What is how comments are ranked?
23. 53.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Can you elaborate?
24. 54.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Are you facing the issue on the blog post or the demo? Or can you open a issue for the same with a scrennshot on our GitHub? Thanks.
25. 55.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    CQ2 is for those 25% who like threads (and complex discussions).
26. 56.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Thanks! Will look into it.
27. 57.▲
    by anandbaburajan 2y ago

    Can you share which page you faced trouble with?
28. 58.▲
    The best way to have complex discussions?(cq2.co)

    512 points by anandbaburajan 2y ago|322 comments
29. 59.▲
    by anandbaburajan 3y ago

    > Because this sounds like an ad so it should be disclosed? I wonder whether we would be having this conversation had I asked a random friend to post this instead of my brother (and hence you wouldn't have found out that the OP is a
30. 60.▲
    by anandbaburajan 3y ago

    > I felt like I was thrown out at sea 20 miles without a lifejacket Interesting. I've now put a helpful toast/hint on the demo. Hope that helps with interacting with the interface. > I am not sure how you square "hyper-