> I felt like I was thrown out at sea 20 miles without a lifejacket Interesting. I've now put a helpful toast/hint on the demo. Hope that helps with interactin

> I felt like I was thrown out at sea 20 miles without a lifejacket Interesting. I've now put a helpful toast/hint on the demo. Hope that helps with interacting with the interface. > I am not sure how you square "hyper-focused" with not "losing context" By hyper-focused, I meant one can discuss one topic at a time in a particular thread. By not losing context, I meant one can clearly see (in the thread to the left of the current thread) where that topic arose from. In regular chats/forums, one needs to keep the context of who quoted what from where in their head. In CQ2, it's clearly visible. > As a newcomer to this interface and this discussion the need for the big picture with context is much greater than the need to zoom in close (how do I know that I care enough to zoom in close w/o the the context?) In CQ2, one would read a message fully, and if the message has quoted threads arising from it, one would decide themselves which thread they want to go deeper in. Does that clear your doubt or did I misunderstand something? > Not so sure lesswrong is the best example if you want a broad range of people to feel included. I just took an example of a complex public discussion I found. Only other examples I have are either personal or private team discussions. Curious to know why you think it matters whether the example is from lesswrong or not? Or maybe you can share what better kind of example would you suggest? > experiments with running YOShInOn against comment feeds that were really promising so better interfaces for comments have been on my mind Interesting! Will drop an email and would love to see what you have in mind. Thanks for all the feedback!