amitport

5 ms·

31.
by amitport 10mo ago
I bet you live in the US. What you describe is not a universal issue.
32.
by amitport 11mo ago
Plenty *commercial* labs frequently prioritized pure science over *immediate* consumer products, but none done so out of charity. Deepmind included.
33.
by amitport 1y ago
What is the point of knowing the right thing to do if you fail to persuade peers, reports, and leaders?
34.
by amitport 1y ago
easy, never give away or sell ancient artifacts. Would you be fine with people conquering rome, and selling it all stone by stone? Would you be OK with some Italian dictator doing it?
35.
by amitport 1y ago
If you know who it belongs to, sure.
36.
by amitport 1y ago
How do you know? It was not free. The people certainly were not free.
37.
by amitport 1y ago
Ottoman did not make the gift they gave to France. A democracy should not accept a tyrant giving a ancient gift from it "people"
38.
by amitport 1y ago
the ruler was maybe somewhat independent, the nation was not. Romans also considered Herolds to be a just ruler of an "free" Judea as far as they are conceres. That's how often subjugation works.
39.
by amitport 1y ago
They were, Egypt was conquered at the time. The empires pillaged it and gifted it among themselves.
40.
by amitport 1y ago
Now I'll just be waiting for Italy to return the colleseum stones to Jerusalem. Pretty sure the temple would have been fine, if they would not have destroyed it themeselves. The "we took it to keep it safe" argument is kinda
41.
by amitport 1y ago
In any case, it didn't belong to the Ottomans to give away. Getting it as gift from a conquering entity, does not make any of it better.
42.
by amitport 1y ago
Egypt was subjugated to the Ottoman Empire at the time. And even if they had some kind of king/dictator, it is certainly was a decision of a free people. What antique France monuments did France give away just like that for no reason?
43.
by amitport 1y ago
Maybe? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bamba_(snack) ;)
44.
by amitport 1y ago
are you just going to ignore Javascript?
45.
by amitport 1y ago
Independent thinking is a trait of those who truly matter. Google would greatly benefit if those who believe there is a genocide in Gaza were to leave
46.
by amitport 1y ago
You are free to discuss things and even protest, without disrupting others' work or violating company's policies, but if your behavior is harmful for the company, you should be fired. It is really not complicated. Never pay sala
47.
by amitport 2y ago
Don't forget it all came to the center stage after a mass butchering at a music festival, few beheadings and some Jewish babies kidnapped. Pretty effective! What is a little terrorism for a greater good! /S
48.
by amitport 2y ago
Even if they made steps, and were ignored, because management disagrees with them or for whatever reason, they still don't get a pass for disrupting normal business. It is a private company, you can say your opinion, but if you disrupt
49.
by amitport 2y ago
Like with any automatic procedure: Are humans better? Specifically, in their own example they are just citing Mandiant, which may itself be wrong... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43595294
50.
by amitport 2y ago
"anti-zionism" is not the same objecting Israel's war against hostage holding Gaza. anti-zionism is being against Jews living in their homeland, promotion of terror against them and pushing for them being ethnically cleansed.
51.
by amitport 2y ago
Mein camp is a all book also She is a Jew. There are much more Muslims running around with connections to other Muslims countries and businessness and you don't go around and calling it the Muslims kabal on every move any Muslim does.
52.
by amitport 2y ago
I sense a lot Jewsphobia from you. Miriam Adelson is an American who happen to be Jewish, and has many many disagreements with the state of Israel. Are you going to classify everyone who does not seek the destruction of Israel as the pro-Is
53.
by amitport 2y ago
I haven't listed the reasons I am pointing the underlying lack of internal critisism in the democractic party and their supporters. The democractic party was terrible in regards to many issues many people cared about. You should stop c
54.
by amitport 2y ago
"Trump is merely doing what he has been paid to do by pro-Israeli zionist lobby - who apparently were the highest bidders" The concept of blaming the Jews on everything wrong in one's country is not new, and it never ends wel
55.
by amitport 2y ago
People voted for Trump because the democratic party is THAT bad. Instead of keeping attacking Trump maybe it is time to ponder what is it about the current democratic party that made so many people disapprove of them.
56.
by amitport 2y ago
Well, it didn't start in a vacuum.
57.
by amitport 2y ago
Louis CK | about airplane Wi Fi https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=me4BZBsHwZs
58.
by amitport 2y ago
IMHO you are missing something big... For Google they are worth 32B, they ARE the Google Security business from now on. They don't even have to be profitable themselves, having this aspect working means google get access to additional
59.
by amitport 2y ago
but is it west ai or east ai?
60.
by amitport 2y ago
that fail... linearization is a bad idea. But plenty of other optimizations are done

More ›