Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ameister14
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
91.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
That's an oversimplification. For example, in the neighborhood I lived in years ago in Flatbush, they had a single family covenant in place since the 19th century.
92.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
>The government isn't prohibiting them from forming a union and there are existing laws against companies retaliating through violence. If the company isn't retaliating with violence, isn't the union supposed to be the thi
93.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
>Chevron says the agency (using qualified agency specialists) are who Congress intends to work out the many, many details that are impossible to write into effective law. That's not entirely accurate. The doctrine only applies to am
94.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
Remote work can result in a significant reduction in expenses for a company. Certainly when covid happened and we ended our office lease we saved thousands per month, even counting the increase in equipment cost for home workers. So even wi
95.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
It's theoretically a medical ethics issue because the system is not ready for deployment, so early use could be counter to competent medical care or the standards of professionalism, both of which would be violations of the AMA princip
96.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
If you are a member of a racial subgroup with a heightened risk of hypercholesterolemia, for example, but the training data set did not have sufficient representation of your subgroup, they may not request tests for this and will ignore wha
97.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
That's interesting - I have always treated the first 3-6 months as a period to make sure the person is a fit and is ramping at the right speed, and letting them go if there is an issue within that period makes way more sense to me than
98.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
I don't know of a case where the Court affirmed shareholder primacy - as far as I am aware it's a state by state thing though since Delaware has it in their code it impacts a massive number of corporations.
99.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
I never understood why businesses accepted this. At least with digital marketing, it is possible to track pretty much everything and connect marketing campaigns with concrete results. It's actually not impossible to gauge the impact of
100.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
It took root in 1919, so I don't think that's actually the issue. The problem is short-term thinking based on financial markets and the ability of corporations to reinvest their capital freely. Regulating stock buybacks and the ab
101.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
The 14th amendment isn't a part of the founding document, and it does. If you are in a similar circumstance to someone, you are treated the same. If you are in a wheelchair and someone else isn't, you are not in the same circumsta
102.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
So you're just a socialist, then? Weird way to put it.
103.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
Interesting, that seems totally at odds with your earlier statement of "Back in the day we just used to say life isn't fair, play with what you have in the best way you could. And it worked." Yes, I agree, anti-discrimination
104.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
It wasn't, actually, it was saying that if you aren't a bigot you should be careful with your words because you are currently giving that impression. People who are upset that handicapped and vulnerable people get help or are prot
105.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
Let's get into the "at the cost of giving a shit about everyone else" part - do you think that, prior to anti-discrimination laws intended to create an even playing field, everyone got some kind of benefit that they no longer
106.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
>You probably have items in your house made by people working for $100 a month - which is less than what slaves in mid 19th century's America earned. But this is not discrimination, this is different, right? Not trying to straw-man
107.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
I see. I've never read his work before, thank you. So they just got Cipolla's definition wrong, then. It looks like the third fundamental law is closer to "a person who causes harm to another person or group of people without
108.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
If you're really complaining that the guy in the wheelchair gets too much assistance in the form of a ramp to get into places or that children aren't treated the same as adults, you should take a hard look at yourself.
109.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
When was this back in the day? Prior to the 1972 amendment to the CRA? Because no, it did not work.
110.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
>At what point in time has our economy been more regulated than it is today? I can't even think of a particular industry that has trended towards less government involvement. In a specific and literal 'number of regulations, pe
111.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
Stupidity is not defined by self-harming actions and beliefs - not sure where you're getting that from. Stupidity is being presented with a problem and an associated set of information and being unable or less able than others are to f
112.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
No - that's the reasoning behind the law. You appear to be struggling with the idea that the law as enacted does not accomplish the goal it was created to accomplish and are working backwards to say that because it is not accomplishing
113.
▲
Effects of Deregulated Markets on Energy Sector Pricing [pdf]
(alexandermackay.org)
1 points
by
ameister14
3y ago
|
1 comments
114.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
"Overall, we estimate that the increase in wholesale markups more than offset the efficiency gains, which can occur when markets are not perfectly competitive."
115.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
I don't think that's actually a magazine. It looks like there are no articles at all, it's just a run of the mill porn website.
116.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
When they are shut down by their host because they disagree with the content or are being pressured by twitter, I can imagine that. When they go out of business? I haven't ever seen people complain about free speech under attack at tha
117.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
I do not agree. It's readable, but not well written. ex. "Fortnite saw 3.9 concurrent players on OG’s launch day, besting recent records, and huge subsequent numbers. It was the number one category on Twitch, bolstered by a 24-hou
118.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
You posted this elsewhere but to be clear, you are wrong. The defund the police movement, at least the one in the US that gained popularity between 2017 and 2021, was explicitly aimed at eliminating the concept of policing. The belief is th
119.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
The "defund the police" movement was not that well organized but I agree, they do have very specific and very well documented goals: the end of policing. They went hand-in-hand with the prison abolitionist movement. I get that yo
120.
▲
by
ameister14
3y ago
Yes. There are statutory protections for whistleblowers, as well: https://www.sec.gov/whistleblower/retaliation
More ›