4 ms·
>The government isn't prohibiting them from forming a union and there are existing laws against companies retaliating through violence. If the company isn't ret
by ameister14 3y ago
>The government isn't prohibiting them from forming a union and there are existing laws against companies retaliating through violence. If the company isn't retaliating with violence, isn't the union supposed to be the thing that protects them? Why don't they just get together and go on strike?
For that to happen the union has to already exist and be powerful.
- AnthonyMouse 3y ago> For that to happen the union has to already exist You can go from not having to union to having one and being on strike all in the same day. > and be powerful. If it is then it is. If it isn't then what's the use in having it?