amatthew

6 ms·

1.
by amatthew 5y ago
wow this is mauvelous
2.
by amatthew 7y ago
I mean, Elinor Ostrom won a Nobel Prize for saying that there are loads of great alternatives besides choosing between property rights and the tragedy of the commons. https://econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Courses/UCSBpf&#x2F
3.
by amatthew 7y ago
"... start hobbies. And be bad at them." Love it. The reasoning sounds like Chestertonian "common sense."
4.
by amatthew 7y ago
Absolutely. But that's the not box to think in to see the problem. Sure, we haven't had that happen in recent memory. Soooo... if there were to be a problem then, that means it wouldn't look what like we think "food pr
5.
by amatthew 7y ago
I'm currently doing a literature review for a research project closely related to this exact topic. And they say reading HN is a waste of time! ;) But seriously. This is a great example of what a lot of other research also points to: t
6.
Speech Recognition in the 1950s(m.youtube.com)
1 points by amatthew 7y ago|0 comments
7.
by amatthew 7y ago
I love the diversity of the two top level posts so far, haha!
8.
by amatthew 8y ago
Can you share your rubric?
9.
by amatthew 8y ago
In what ways were they that important later in life?
10.
by amatthew 8y ago
Yeah, I agree with you there. I was trying to make a point closer to what jkaplowitz above mentioned in their last three paragraphs.
11.
by amatthew 8y ago
Why not either? For both the Christian and the Atheist, honest scholarship is inseparable from their beliefs. It's hard to imagine either changing their beliefs from the evidence they could find. The consequences of being able to prove
12.
by amatthew 8y ago
How did you manage to negotiate that? Especially for earlier career jobs?