amanmangal

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by amanmangal 8y ago

   correct!
2. 2.▲
   by amanmangal 8y ago

   Our current plan is to store []byte given that badger stores blobs of bytes. Using interface{} may have some overhead, but we are no so worried about that right now.
3. 3.▲
   by amanmangal 8y ago

   We just updated the graphs to show throughput numbers instead. Should be more clear now.
4. 4.▲
   by amanmangal 8y ago

   This is true that the latency of each operation won't change much as we increase concurrent accesses, but the amortized latency would (be expected to) reduce as the graphs show. When we did benchmarks, the Go benchmark framework provid