amake

4 ms·

31.
by amake 10mo ago
> it doesn't work for transitive deps unless those are specified by SHA as well, which is out of your control So in other words the strategy in the docs doesn't actually address the issue
32.
by amake 10mo ago
> There's no Noto Serif for CJK characters Yes there is: https://fonts.google.com/noto/specimen/Noto+Serif+JP
33.
by amake 10mo ago
You said: > blowing it up out of proportion is just as toxic Making a false equivalency of the supposed toxicity of the commenter's post and the toxicity displayed in the article. You can just take the L; you don't have to be p
34.
by amake 10mo ago
> You can be toxic at any level And yet the context is extremely important. > I didn't factor this in That's how you get to false equivalencies.
35.
by amake 10mo ago
> blowing it up out of proportion is just as toxic One person decided that something wasn't for them. How is that in the same league as someone in a leadership position being unprofessional?
36.
by amake 11mo ago
Might as well get rid of laws against murder because sometimes people commit murder anyway?
37.
by amake 11mo ago
99% of my use of `satisfies` is to type-check exhaustivity in `switch` statements: type Foo = 'foo' | 'bar'; const myFoo: Foo = 'foo'; switch (myFoo) { case 'foo': &#x
38.
by amake 11mo ago
“Pro” users are using containers, venvs, version managers (nvm, rvm, etc.). They definitely aren’t installing project-specific stuff directly to the system.
39.
by amake 11mo ago
Your analogy is infinitely more baffling to me than OP's comment.
40.
by amake 11mo ago
Really? Almost always I feel the diff captures only the how , not the why .
41.
by amake 1y ago
The Process is the Punishment
42.
by amake 1y ago
Why in the world do you think you are in a position to decide what is good?
43.
by amake 1y ago
Even Japan is mostly Unicode these days.
44.
by amake 1y ago
> It’s very much well known in the aviation community Do you think the article is speaking primarily to the "aviation community"?
45.
by amake 1y ago
That's fundamental to the mission of Unicode because Unicode is meant to be compatible with all legacy character sets, and those character sets already included combining characters. So "no combinations" was never going to ha
46.
by amake 1y ago
What does "no combinations" mean?
47.
by amake 1y ago
That has nothing to do with UTF-8; that's a Unicode issue, and one that's entirely unescapable if you are the Unicode Consortium and your goal is to be compatible with all legacy charsets.
48.
by amake 1y ago
> That all went away with the helicopter parents Insane to blame parents when Republicans have been destroying all manner of public goods for the last however many decades.
49.
by amake 1y ago
There is a local-only, no-signup-required executable available at https://languagetool.org/download/ They don't advertise this because they are trying to push their paid online services. I have complained about th
50.
by amake 1y ago
And?
51.
by amake 1y ago
(More than?) half of the difficulty comes from the vocabulary. It’s very much a shibboleth—learn to talk the talk and people will assume you are a genius who walks the walk.
52.
by amake 1y ago
If it was self-evident then I wouldn’t need to ask for evidence. And I imagine you wouldn’t need to be waving your hands making excuses for the lack of evidence.
53.
by amake 1y ago
Using AI tools make AI tools is not the impact outside of the AI bubble that people are looking for.
54.
by amake 1y ago
> Those businesses are probably everywhere. They just aren't open about admitting "Where's the evidence?" "Probably everywhere." OK, good luck, have fun
55.
by amake 1y ago
> This is happening right now and it won’t be obvious until I asked for evidence and, as always, lots of people are popping out of the woodwork to swear that it's true but I can't see the evidence yet. OK, then. Good luck wit
56.
by amake 1y ago
> All around you, just that it doesn’t make sense for developers to reveal that OK, but I asked for evidence and people just keep not providing any. "God is all around you; he just works in mysterious ways" OK, good luck with t
57.
by amake 1y ago
None of this seems relevant to the original claim: "Software projects that somehow are 100% human developed will not be competitive with AI assisted or written projects" I don't feel like it's meaningful to discuss the &
58.
by amake 1y ago
> It's not obvious because people producing high quality stuff have no incentive at all to mark their changes as AI-generated I feel like we'd be hearing from business that crushed their competition by delivering faster or with
59.
by amake 1y ago
> We have AI agents that have been trained to review thousands of PRs that are produced by other, generative agents, and together they have already churned out much more software than human teams can write in a year. Was your comment ton
60.
by amake 1y ago
> #2 Software projects that somehow are 100% human developed will not be competitive with AI assisted or written projects Still waiting to see evidence of AI-driven projects eating the lunch of "traditional" projects.

More ›