Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
alwayseasy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
91.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Yes they do it for tax purposes and the tax laws do apply of course.
92.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Haha the argument became "GoFundMe is censoring free speech but actually it's not speech it's just fundraising."
93.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Speech is dependent on context and audience. I realize there are some basic concepts around speech we don't seem to share. Your argument that anyone can write anything no matter context or audience reactions and face no consequences is
94.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Roger Stone.
95.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
If your audience reacts to content like it's a dog-whistle, maybe don't be surprised when you're banned? Talking about "investigating voter fraud" when Trump was claiming voter fraud with no evidence and then gettin
96.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Funny how various US courts of law disagree with you and Rubio. The information the SIC vol.5 regroups was used to convict quite a few of Trump's campaign associates.
97.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
I'm not your monkey but this one is easy enough: "Even just a few matches would be indicative of a much more substantial voter fraud operation" said by a Trump supporter who get's the support from a majority of misinform
98.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
I've read your links but somehow it feels you haven't read mine as they offer later rebuttals to your sources. You may insist that Rubio said something about the report is an official source but his words are contradicted by the r
99.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
He was part of the Trump campaign in 2016 and from the 3rd to the 6th he interacted with various Twitter accounts that fueled the conspiracy and his fundraising was clearly attracting an audience who read between the lines. GoFundMe is in t
100.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Yeah. In a thread where the debate is about "people being able to form their opinions on their own" it seems like they really like to depend on spoon-fed talking points.
101.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Collusion in the context of election campaigns has no legal definition. If I'm the one who believes in fake news I wonder why you're the one sourcing your beliefs from controversial and disavowed summaries and partisan actors.
102.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Once again, you're not linking to a source document that explicitly presents evidence. In fact there are clearly more than a hundred pages about Trump and Russians engaging in activity around the 2016 campaign. You link to a partisan S
103.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Impressive, a throwaway account that uses the very controversial summary that Barr wrote quickly before the report was released and without Mueller's re-reading. Here's the follow up from NPR where Mueller later distanced himself
104.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
GoFundMe is allowed to look at off platform behavior to decide.
105.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Mueller report and various indictments with pretty documented evidence.
106.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
They do take a stance on what can be amplified through ads or not. Hence its political nature.
107.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Identifying true problems in a country but ending with an anti-system solution is populism: "Don't vote for a president, this is useless, they are all the same and complete garbage, the system is not designed for a competent perso
108.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Shorts get caught. Easier to have Elon Musk tweet "I'll buy Hertz at $69 a share to make all their cars autonomous".
109.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
You're about free trade with no security guarantees? It doesn't work, trade blocks align where security guarantees are the best. Say goodbye to cheap labour, products, natural ressources and interest in the American dollar. Compla
110.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Your world view calls for the US being isolationist from it's main allies. NATO is a military alliance but has an economic underpinning that strongly advantages the US. NATO is also about countering geopolitical adversaries, Russia is
111.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
I would tend to agree but him retweeting a video of someone yelling "White power", clearly and distinctively multiple times does tend to lower the tolerance for any type of catchphrase that has a racist past.
112.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
The "agreed upon amount" is due by 2024. So yes, it's crazy to threaten to pull out 6 years ahead of schedule while the main adversary is at war with Ukraine and targeting American soldiers in the Middle East. Source: https:
113.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
You want a market economy that is competitive and where dominant players are curtailed to avoid them stifling innovation. Did society actually need the internet when the Telecommunications Act of 1996 said AT&T had to release some of th
114.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
"When the looting starts, the shooting starts" is a phrase by Walter E. Headley, the police chief of Miami, Florida, who said it in response to an outbreak of violent crime during the 1967 Christmas holiday season. Donald Trump wa
115.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Facebook is not "the means of communication" comparable to Congress. It's a private company that can control the types of ads it runs.
116.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
I'd expect the FBI to be better at it than 4chan though.
117.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
Russia did not limit it's election interference to hacking one single server. This is actually very straightforward. Here are more details and evidence if you are sincere and want to dig deeper: https://www.intelligence.sen
118.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
You're asking for clear evidence but then using an op-ed from a known controversial journalist on Syria, sharing a Wikileaks leak after the GRU was caught hacking the OPCW ? Clear evidence you can't fake: a rush of hundreds of peo
119.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
There has been direct testimony from intelligence officials and thousands of pages of reports including very technical details. Do you want server logs, intercepts, confessions? All these provide nothing of value to the general public. When
120.
▲
by
alwayseasy
6y ago
It is intelligence, not "at best circumstantial evidence". And no, "all kinds of people" did not have the same explicit motives highlighted by the Muller Report, the Senate Committee, or 18 US intelligence agencies showe
More ›