Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
alva
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
181.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Not just China. Walking around the wealthiest areas of London I sometimes get a sickening feeling when I think about their occupants. The most beautiful houses and essentially palaces are largely owned by people who have raped their countri
182.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Because killing thousands upon thousands of innocent Afghanis, Iraqis, Pakistanis, Somalis, Yemenis and Syrian civilians so far with relatively conventional weapons has been reliable judgement? Maybe with robot armies they could have killed
183.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Genuinely thought this might be a Jerry Springer piece
184.
▲
Guccifer 2.0: Game Over
(g-2.space)
1 points
by
alva
10y ago
|
0 comments
185.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Worth reading the entire thread.
186.
▲
Questions over Twitter's shadow-bans and TL manipulation
(twitter.com)
6 points
by
alva
10y ago
|
6 comments
187.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
> You claimed it was impossible for him to find an exchange, and then he revealed his exchange Wrong. "1. How did someone outside the financial world get access to an exchange that would allow this" "First bit of proof I t
188.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
This is simple. What proof do you have of his claims?
189.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
You are strongly defending him. What proof do you have of his claims? If this turns out to be a dodgy submission for self promotion it is mildly embarrassing for IndieHackers if they admit error in this instance. If it turns out you have se
190.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Post your historic and current positions, opened and closed. I am not the only one who is extremely sceptical about your claims.
191.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Post your current and historic positions, opened and closed and people might believe you. Currently you have offered absolutely no proof of your claims and the interview suggests you are extremely naive of trading.
192.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Hey. As we spoke about this earlier today, could you please post the original before the edits post our conversation? edit: I rang the bloody alarm bells about this submission with you. I hope I am wrong, but it looks like you have been had
193.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
One example might help reinforce my case. Note to commenters, I am not making any judgements on these communities, these are just my observations. A hard left community which is heavily invested in identity politics is inherently vulnerable
194.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Thats very different from having 95% success buying and selling. He isn't stating a 95% return, but that the algorithm works 95% of the time. This is unheard of, let alone from someone who started learning finance 5 months ago.
195.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Im not sure what the answer to that question is. What appears to be the case is that if certain movements at their core significant weight on identifying/separating groups of people, especially based on grievance, it will inevitably sp
196.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Exactly. That behaviour shows you they can be split easily. Medium term infiltration into these groups is straightforward as the external signifiers of group membership are known and easy to emulate. Stimulate what appears to be a genuine d
197.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
The opposite! The aim isn't to get a rise out of them, it is to split them. Lighting the spark that causes significant in-fighting means they do all the work for you. The environment in some of these vulnerable groups make this simple.
198.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Reposting my comment on the first HN submission of this page "The claims made in this interview are extremely suspect, it just not make sense. Absolutely no relevant details are included. The developer claims he was able to built an AI
199.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Certain communities are extremely sensitive to disruption through trolling, especially if the group inherently places high importance on highlighting differences between members and in-groups. "Modern left" leaning groups are so e
200.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
How many trades have you executed?
201.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
What regulatory issues do you face trading with the Indian Stock Exchange when based in the US? Also you mention you had some concern that some of the stocks may crash. Have you worked in finance in the past to be familiar with the securiti
202.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
The claims made in this interview are extremely suspect, it just not make sense. Absolutely no relevant details are included. The developer claims he was able to built an AI trading strategy that is profitable 95% of the time. No technical
203.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
This is the most interesting bit for me : > It shares little about the data used for the AI's decision-making and isn't profitable
204.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
fantastic idea. significant chunk of uk gov bills/statements are published online, i may build a scraper for this project
205.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
We should absolutely not be dismissing his seeming intentions. There should be massive focus on this. But that does not excuse conflating opinion/analysis with fact. Accurate reporting of the news is so tremendously important. Every si
206.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
I think your analysis of the situation is likely correct and I condemn it. I still believe the mainstream news should Clearly separate the cold hard facts from analysis and opinion.
207.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
It is totally false to say Trump has enacted a law to ban people from entering the US based on their religion. Totally false. Is it true that Rudy Giulani has said this. It also true Trump has said in the past he wants a Muslim ban. It is a
208.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Does any of that change the hard facts that what was enacted is not a ban on people coming to the US based on their religion. Because that is the pure fact.
209.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
Yes you are right that he had done so. And if he had signed into law a ban people coming to the country based on their religion, then the papers plastering "Trump enacts Muslim Ban" would be accurate. But that is not the case.
210.
▲
by
alva
10y ago
>"a ban on travelers from majority Muslim countries by a president who has promised his supporters a ban on Muslims" would that still be misleading? That would be a very accurate summary. Not misleading in the slightest. >&q
More ›