Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
alterom
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
331.
▲
by
alterom
11mo ago
1. The download link is not the project link (which I have provided, and the website has not). 2. No matter how much this conflict is being mislabeled as "genocide" by the interested parties, it doesn't change the reality tha
332.
▲
by
alterom
11mo ago
>Remember that a therapist is really a friend you are paying for. That's an awful, and awfully wrong definition that's also harmful. It's also disrespectful and demeaning to both the professionals and people seeking help
333.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
Did you just graduate college? It sure must feel like 2018 was a long time ago when that's more than the entirety of your adult life. I get it. The rest of us aren't that excited to trust our lives to technology that confident
334.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
Yeah, and let's not forget that "I drive like a mildly blind idiot" is only a viable (literally) choice when everyone else doesn't do that and compensates for your idiocy.
335.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
You're absolutely right. The world never ceases to surprise me with its stupidity. Thanks for your contribution.
336.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>I had a friend who had his Tesla drive him from his driveway in another city 3+ hrs away to my driveway with no intervention. I had anecdata that was data, and it said that full-self-driving is wishful thinking. We cool now?
337.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>Walking is going pretty well for robotics lately. Just like self-driving is going well on an empty race track. >Good luck with that take Good luck running into a walking robot in the street in your lifetime.
338.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>It would be possible to be infinitely arbitrary to the point of “AGI” never being reachable by some yard sticks while still performing most viable labor. "Most viable labor" involves getting things from one place to another,
339.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>Teslas and Waymo’s drive better than the majority of humans already. In restricted settings. Yeah no fam. >but is driving really the yardstick you want to use? Yes, because it's an easy one, compared, say, to walking . But if
340.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>Bit like blaming a airplane building company for NOT building airplanes FTFY. OpenAI has not built AGI (not yet , it you want to be optimistic). If you really need an analogy, it's more in the vein of giving SpaceX crap for ya
341.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
Is there, really?
342.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
Yeah, they wouldn't make something up, the expert panel would. Because everyone knows that once you call a group of people an expert panel , that automatically means they can't be biased /s
343.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
I guess big as in widely impactful. Making a new plugin standard that is gaining wide adoption is big in my head.
344.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>I had no idea you've never heard of it. Thanks for keeping us informed. I see. In that case, you'll appreciate the fact that the Three Musketeers chocolate bar bears no relationship to Alexander Dumas, the author of the fa
345.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
Wow, didn't realize u-he grew so big. I remember them from Zebra days.
346.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
Triumph is also a garment brand? Never heard of it.
347.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
I'd say the same of RFC 1149¹ ____ ¹ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1149
348.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
Yeah, as if reading and understanding RFCs was the pastime of the commoner in Ye Olde Dayse. Or as if the vibe-coder of today would've totally™ definitely© be the type of person to peruse the RFCs. It's like saying the the proof o
349.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>I'm very much pro hyper-automation, especially for all government work... but can't help but think this type of branding is just in bad faith and that these are not good people. >It just screams fried-serotonin circuits to
350.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
Yeah, diameter is ambiguous (is it the diameter of the disk in space, or in the geometry/topology of the Earth's surface?). Either way, they point is, it's a lot of coverage.
351.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>Does this mean that when you disable, all labels are deleted AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Ha. Nice one.
352.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
Not just that. Jet engines are efficient at higher speeds because the exhaust of the jet engine is fast . If the plane is going fast as well, that exhaust is more or less stationary relative to the ground. The engine works to exchange th
353.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
Being able to afford to move somewhere isn't only about the money. Family, friends, support networks, availability of employment, and a million other factors apply. Glad you had the opportunity. For me, moving to a walkable neighborh
354.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
Ah. Ditto.
355.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>You can say you're a victim of circumstance or you can say I care a lot about something and have more control over your life. >I'm biased because I'm 45 and have never driven a car in my life. I learned to drive when I
356.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>I like (by which I mean I think it indicates a lack of moral character) This isn't coherent, sorry. >that you say this despite the articles conclusion being... Notice that I said that the hypothesis is supported by the data pr
357.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>People just don't value it as highly as they claim they do. Whatever. Change it to "city infrastructure heavily incentivizing people to drive everywhere by heavily penalizing all other modes of transportation and prioriti
358.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
You seem to agree with the parent comment
359.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
The article that fails to consider that the sedans have changed in shape and size over the past 20 years? The article that has all the cool plots, and no relevant information like the actual vehicles being discussed? The article that does
360.
▲
by
alterom
1y ago
>Like what even is the point of a raw "deaths by state" map? It does give slightly more insight than the map of US state population per capita[1]. [1] https://facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=710896291698831&am
More ›