alterego

25 ms·

1. 1.▲
   Matt Blaze on "Key Escrow from a Safe Distance" [pdf](crypto.com)

   1 points by alterego 15y ago|0 comments
2. 2.▲
   Matt Blaze on cryptography and wiretappong(crypto.com)

   3 points by alterego 15y ago|0 comments
3. 3.▲
   Matt Blaze: How ACM and IEEE Shake Down Science(crypto.com)

   240 points by alterego 16y ago|64 comments
4. 4.▲
   Matt Blaze on Applied Cryptography, 15 years later(crypto.com)

   25 points by alterego 16y ago|7 comments
5. 5.▲
   by alterego 17y ago

   I think this article isn't talking about random vs. profiled (which is what the mit paper is about), but random vs. 100% (where there 100% has been analyzed carefully to be sufficient to detect large bombs, etc.).
6. 6.▲
   by alterego 17y ago

   But if you read the article, I believe the point was that if the terrorist gets caught under a random system, the terrorist still achieves a positive result for the terrorists (the govt becomes forced to shut down aviation and then apply th
7. 7.▲
   Matt Blaze: How unpredictable screening helps terrorists(crypto.com)

   56 points by alterego 17y ago|62 comments