alreadydone

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by alreadydone 2y ago

   Latest update here: https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=13895 Unfortunately it seems Mochizuki and Scholze reached consensus that a part of Joshi's argument cannot possibly work.
2. 2.▲
   by alreadydone 2y ago

   I think TTT stands for "tangled type theory".
3. 3.▲
   by alreadydone 3y ago

   Could the chromatic number be less than 4 (for some or all hat/turtle/spectre tilings)? Note that for the lattice tilings by squares and equilateral triangles the chromatic number is 2, while for the tiling by regular hexagons it
4. 4.▲
   by alreadydone 3y ago

   Thanks! arXiv Vanity fails on this one: https://arxiv-vanity.com/papers/2305.17743
5. 5.▲
   by alreadydone 3y ago

   I hope these tables help: https://twitter.com/Junyan_Xu/status/1663396061942038530
6. 6.▲
   by alreadydone 3y ago

   My eventual solutions to lvl 5,6,7 are hilariously easy; you can find them at https://gist.github.com/alreadydone/579138f2692f439c56646052... In similar spirit as these techniques: https://news.ycombinator.c
7. 7.▲
   by alreadydone 3y ago

   You could give this a try: https://www.aomni.com/
8. 8.▲
   The Ramanujan Machine is an intellectual fraud(galoisrepresentations.wordpress.com)

   4 points by alreadydone 7y ago|0 comments