alontorres

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by alontorres 8mo ago

   I do feel like the latest codex 5.2 and 5.3 have been really excellent in coding and have been giving opus a good fight. I still prefer Opus 4.6 as my daily driver but specifically for coding tasks I think codex 5.3 is the best, especially
2. 2.▲
   by alontorres 8mo ago

   This is the strongest argument against it, I think. Sometimes you can't easily tell from the output whether someone thought deeply and used AI to polish, or just prompted and published. That adds another layer of cognitive burden for p
3. 3.▲
   by alontorres 8mo ago

   I'd push back a bit on "writing itself isn't that hard." Clear writing is difficult, and many people with good ideas struggle to communicate them effectively. An LLM can help bridge that gap. I do agree with your core po
4. 4.▲
   by alontorres 8mo ago

   I think that this requires some nuance. Was the post generated with a simple short prompt that contributed little? Sure, it's probably slop. But if the post was generated through a long process of back-and-forth with the model, where s
5. 5.▲
   by alontorres 8mo ago

   I can't believe it took them that long. Though I guess the number of active users using a vision pro is probably very low...