Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aljun_invictus
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
Show HN: Leapcell – Deploy 20 Python/JS/Go/Rust Projects for Free
(leapcell.io)
1 points
by
aljun_invictus
1y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
Show HN: Leapcell – A platform to ship APIs and websites online at minimal cost
(leapcell.io)
4 points
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
Leapcell: Efficient, Scalable Cloud Platform for Distributed Applications
(leapcell.io)
1 points
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
Deploy a Gin Service on Leapcell: Serverless, Never Paying for Idle Time
(substack.com)
1 points
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
Implement RabbitMQ (AMQP) or Kafka Protocols in Go
(old.reddit.com)
1 points
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
You're right, there are many trade-offs involved. I'm considering this as well, but it's best to use a widely adopted ecosystem for external use.
7.
▲
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
I offer some features that they have partially or don't have at all (such as priority queues and label filtering). The reason I raised this question is that I hope to reuse their protocol layers to reduce the burden on people during th
8.
▲
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
We have currently implemented both push and pull models, along with disk storage, and we provide services internally through gRPC. Our goal now is to offer these services externally. However, one downside of message queues is the fragmentat
9.
▲
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
We support both push and pull models (it seems both RabbitMQ and Kafka support both). Our implementation is actually more like Kafka (for example, it supports replay), but implementing RabbitMQ's routing isn't very complicated eit
10.
▲
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
My new queue has better capabilities and performance, and I want the user migration to be smoother. Therefore, I hope to use a better ecosystem.
11.
▲
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
I asked this question in other communities, and they all expressed that RabbitMQ (AMQP) has more features. Can you tell me which features of Kafka you think are more complex and difficult to implement?
12.
▲
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
Honestly, my service is most similar to Kafka (it can replay), but implementing the routing of RabbitMQ doesn't seem too complicated.
13.
▲
Which protocol is more complex to implement: RabbitMQ (AMQP) or Apache Kafka?
3 points
by
aljun_invictus
2y ago
|
16 comments
14.
▲
by
aljun_invictus
5y ago
Really? Because I am just a Japanese lover, and I have studied it for a while, and I often hear it in songs. Maybe I don’t have a deep understanding of authentic usage. I think I can seriously think about changing my name.
15.
▲
by
aljun_invictus
5y ago
the name is inspired by a Japanese word, and I'm sorry for my unfortunate name choice , I once search on Google when I start this project, but unfortunately I turn on the safe mode ...
16.
▲
Hora 0.1, maybe the fastest AI search algorithm library
(horasearch.com)
28 points
by
aljun_invictus
5y ago
|
5 comments
17.
▲
Hora 0.1.1, maybe the fastest AI similarity search algorithm library
1 points
by
aljun_invictus
5y ago
|
0 comments